Playing games together is a good way to build closer relationships.
Having a healthy relationship is the ultimate concern of people regarding their social life. While some believe that it is better not to play games with others to have an intimate relationship. I beg to differ, I think that playing games, and better contact with other individuals can help tremendously build a great and close relationship.
Many people out there propose that continuous contact with others can seriously cause more harm than benefits as conflicts between the two parties can occur. Since everyone has his perspective, in my opinion, I believe that this theory is false. The more we spend time performing different activities with other individuals, such as games, the deeper and closer the relationship gets. Back in the days, In my sophomore year at dental school, I was new to the city, and I had no friends, only a few casual acquaintances. But, after I joined the basket teams at the college, I gained genuine friends. Because of the fact that I used to spend a lot of time together training for that match. If I had not played basketball with them, I would not have been close to them.
Moreover, by playing games with others, a person can discover more exciting parts of their characters, which eventually helps in making the relationship even closer. But some introvert types of people might contradict this. They suggest that it is better to find other alternative ways to build relations with others. Personally, I think that when the person plays, He shows his real personality by being genuine toward others. My previous experience during that basketball play taught me a lot about other players. I learned that whenever I was down and needed help. They would help me and support me to go through tough times. As a result, we were all like a big happy family.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that in order to become close to someone, spend more time with this person and play games to achieve a healthy and intimate relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | YasamanEsml | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | wyc | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | wyc | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-25 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
- A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
- Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school which way can bring them the most benefit 1 To accumulate work experience by a part time job or volunteering in a community project 2 Learning to play a sport 3 Learning to play a music 60
- l 70
- The Komodo dragon is a very large species of lizard that lives on a few small islands in Indonesia When the reptiles were first intensively studied their hunting technique left many biologists puzzled because they simply bit their prey and then waited for 80
- Playing games together is a good way to build closer relationships 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of people regarding their social life. While some believe that it is better not to p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: Because
... the college, I gained genuine friends. Because of the fact that I used to spend a lot of time together ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86011904762 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70176302721 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6759032302 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9473684211 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221701910944 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589029403357 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067250010667 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143470565488 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472941352815 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.