Question:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people suggest that a well-created relationship between teacher and student is the most important ability for a teacher. They argue that teachers must have a good relationship in order to do their job well. However, in my opinion, I strongly disagree to these people and believe that delivering an excellent knowledge of the subject is more important. I will delineate my viewpoint based on following two reasons.
First of all, students value the contents and how much they can learn about a subject through a class the most. For example, students and their parents look for teachers who are famous for teaching subjects very fluently rather than teachers who can relate well to their students. There can be some students who prioritize the teacher’s characteristics and ability to communicate with students. Nevertheless, a recent study conducted by Seoul National University says that students put the professor’s knowledge and the class content on the top priority when evaluating their professors through assessment surveys compared to their relationship factors such as friendliness or communication skills. Thus, it is reasonable to claim that excellent knowledge comes before the communication skills.
Second of all, because of constrained time between teachers and students, questions on if making a well relationship between them are viable rises. For example, students spend limited time on their classes in a day. Time might be not sufficient enough for the children to create a well-made rapport between teachers. Some suggest that in order to deliver the contents efficiently a good relationship is required. However, although an efficient delivery can be helpful on communication, students might not have enough time to create a nice relationship with their teachers. Especially when students are looking forward to taking an important exam such as university entering exam, students are chased and stressed by limited time. They have to cover the materials and contents of the exam first, saving time for good relationship with teachers later. Thus, to respect the students as an important entity for a class and save their time, delivering excellent knowledge seems to be more important.
To conclude, deciding which ability is more important in between relating well with students and teaching excellent knowledge can be complex. Some might argue that teachers need great relationship with students. Nevertheless, I still contend to the idea that excellent knowledge should be prioritized over these skills considering the fact that students prioritize the classes’ content first and student’s limited time on classes.
- It is better to study alone than in a group 73
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing a 79
- If your friends want to change their lifestyle to achieve a positive lifestyle which of the following suggestions would you recommend 1 Be more disciplined and have a stronger will 2 Work with people who share the same goals 3 Consult a professional exper 75
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 75
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, still, thus, well, for example, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2247.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49388753056 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98077804455 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476772616137 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3944040495 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.35 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277554913705 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979160504539 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698077944713 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202483164471 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494382228474 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.