Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Most people in the world beleive that daily team-based communcation is better to be held in person rather than through email. In my perspective, conveying infromation through e-mail is more sufficnt for professional and educational team work. I have two reasons to support my notion which I explore in the following essay.
To begin with, information transformation through email provides the oppotuitnity for all the members to recieve everthing preciesly with details without any fault. By doing so, we can avoid any misundresting in the process and run the project more smothly. The more easier and shoeter the communications become, the more energy would be spent on the quality of the project. My personal experience during the COVID 19 quirantineis a compelling evidence of his issue. When the restrictions started, my colleagues and I were nurveous about the future and how we should communicate to develop our projects , while we work remotely. But, after a few month of online communcation we were all satisfied with our results, and even now that the pandemic is over,we, beside our boss, feel that this approach this more profitable not just for the company and its projects but also for the employees duo to the fact the the rate of mistakes and flaws has delined dramaticly. If we had not to experience the qurentine during the pandemic, we would not have come to the idea that out process is more efficient during e-mail communacation.
Secundly, by conveying data through e-mail in a professional environment, the project management become more easier that the past. Furthermore, by having the record of all the transmited information and files, no one will miss small detail. Additionally, it does not have the detrimental effects and repercusssion of oral communication. Taking my aforementioned experience into account, we used to experience a lot of hinders in the design process in our firm because of misconceptions in daily conversaions. By the time we started to work remotely, our productivity increased significantly and e-mail eliminated the chance of the daily mistakes that used to slowed us down. If we were not foreced to worked through e-mail we could not have be able to increase our team's speed.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that communication through e-mail has enourmos positive and profound impacts in projects quality. This is because not only the increase the efficieny of the working process but also increase their speed by inhibiting the chance of mis-understanding in daily conversations.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-15 saharmnd 80 view
2023-03-15 saharmnd 78 view
2023-02-26 hamidbrz 83 view
2023-02-18 zaid 83 view
2023-01-26 lolo_7 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user lilipo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...s and run the project more smothly. The more easier and shoeter the communications become, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ould communicate to develop our projects , while we work remotely. But, after a fe...
^^
Line 2, column 643, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun month seems to be countable; consider using: 'few months'.
Suggestion: few months
... , while we work remotely. But, after a few month of online communcation we were all sati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 754, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
..., and even now that the pandemic is over,we, beside our boss, feel that this approa...
^^^
Line 2, column 880, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...mpany and its projects but also for the employees duo to the fact the the rate of mistake...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 906, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... also for the employees duo to the fact the the rate of mistakes and flaws has delined ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 906, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... also for the employees duo to the fact the the rate of mistakes and flaws has delined ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ironment, the project management become more easier that the past. Furthermore, by having t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... information and files, no one will miss small detail. Additionally, it does not ...
^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y mistakes that used to slowed us down. If we were not foreced to worked through e...
^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...worked through e-mail we could not have be able to increase our teams speed. In ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18491484185 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14278589266 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54501216545 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8628169804 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.388888889 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18449825613 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597600374361 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374444680984 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110251585687 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267266315905 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...s and run the project more smothly. The more easier and shoeter the communications become, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ould communicate to develop our projects , while we work remotely. But, after a fe...
^^
Line 2, column 643, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun month seems to be countable; consider using: 'few months'.
Suggestion: few months
... , while we work remotely. But, after a few month of online communcation we were all sati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 754, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
..., and even now that the pandemic is over,we, beside our boss, feel that this approa...
^^^
Line 2, column 880, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...mpany and its projects but also for the employees duo to the fact the the rate of mistake...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 906, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... also for the employees duo to the fact the the rate of mistakes and flaws has delined ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 906, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... also for the employees duo to the fact the the rate of mistakes and flaws has delined ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ironment, the project management become more easier that the past. Furthermore, by having t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... information and files, no one will miss small detail. Additionally, it does not ...
^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y mistakes that used to slowed us down. If we were not foreced to worked through e...
^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...worked through e-mail we could not have be able to increase our teams speed. In ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18491484185 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14278589266 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54501216545 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8628169804 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.388888889 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18449825613 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597600374361 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374444680984 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110251585687 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267266315905 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.