Helping children to do their work, an important element of parents' life, have been valued and even triggers a heated discussion over whether should parents help their children. Helping kids to do their work, in some people's views, is unnecessary because they think that kids should do their work independently. Contrary to these people's opinion is my perspective that helping children to do their work is beneficial, due to contributions to save time and maintain a closer relationship.
What must be prioritized first is that helping children to do their work, instead of let them do by themselves, will positively influence the efficiency of both children and parents because of the help from parents. To begin with, children could do work quickly by the assistance of their father and mother. To be more specific, help from parents will reduce the difficulty of some hard tasks, so children could cope with them effectively; however, without this assistance, children may feel boring and are willing to give up when facing some hard works. Moreover, encouraging kids to finish their work independently will make parents waste a lot of time by answering children' questions when they are in trouble. In detail, it may cost plenty of time and vigor to solve children's problems after they fail many times.
What is equally worth discussing is that helping kids to do their work, rather than do it independently, will exert a positive effect on maintaining a relationship. Initially, during tackling their work, parents and kids are cooperating and exchanging thoughts directly and quickly. Specifically, these interactions are benefit for facilitating communication between them; on the other hand, this convenient opportunity will be missed if kids do their work alone. Additionally, it is possible for parents to know about children' emotional situation and to take actions if needed. To explain it further, when kids have some stress about study, parents can easily notice when help them do their project.
Efficiency of both children and parents, by helping kids to do their work, will be improved due to the reduction of task's difficulty. Maintaining a relationship, from the assistance of kid's father and mother, will be promoted accounting for frequently interactions. To conclude, only by helping kids to do their work can parents improve efficiency and maintain a closer relationship with their kids.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People can take care of their family members better when they live in big city than in countryside 90
- Disagree or agree It is impossible to be completely honest with your friend 3
- People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'parent'
Suggestion: parent
...a heated discussion over whether should parents help their children. Helping kids to do...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...r work independently. Contrary to these peoples opinion is my perspective that helping ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aining a relationship. Initially, during tackling their work, parents and kids ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27202072539 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94090292901 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492227979275 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2800741683 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.1875 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.561653110118 0.236089414692 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229342109326 0.076458572812 300% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122562614122 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3955189518 0.150856017488 262% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803317192012 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'parent'
Suggestion: parent
...a heated discussion over whether should parents help their children. Helping kids to do...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...r work independently. Contrary to these peoples opinion is my perspective that helping ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aining a relationship. Initially, during tackling their work, parents and kids ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27202072539 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94090292901 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492227979275 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2800741683 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.1875 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.561653110118 0.236089414692 238% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229342109326 0.076458572812 300% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122562614122 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3955189518 0.150856017488 262% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803317192012 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.