Various conditions in different regions might lead to a discrepant option on whether subsidize roads and highways or public transportation. Well, I hold the view that spending money on the former one might be a better choice according to my experience I will illustrate this assertion with reasons by the conjuction of economic development, the employment rate and citizens' lives.
First and foremost, the improvement of roads and highways might be more efficient to the development of economy in a city. Initially, the enhancement of the roads makes the transportation from others cities more rapidly, correspondingly attracting more trucks and wares importing towards our cities. Furthermore, the convenience of the highways might be another attraction to enterprises and investors to pay more attention on our cities' progression and invest their money to the industrial districts. Compared with the economic advantages which are brought by spending money on public transportation, such as the efficiency of the commute, ways to improve highways and roads, combining the income from more import and the potential economic proliferation bringing about by investment, is better.
Also, from the employment rate aspect, investment on roads and highways shows more benefits on employment. The expansion of the economy growth might lead to an industrial enlargement such as the mass production and new factories founded. So there is a corresponding increasing demand on workers and directors for those production and manufactories. Apparently, this approach will decrease the unemployment rate and also attract more employees from other cities to work here.
Last but not least, the recreation will be more various if the highways towards other places are more time-saving. In the past, if individuals are likely to cost 2 hours to go to a place of interest located in an adjacent area, in all likelihood, people would not spend that much of time to entertain themselves. But, nowadays, with the development and perfect of the highways, people are able to not only spend their time to nearby famous places but also can have meals or go camping to other cities only in half an hour. Indeed, subsidizing the roads and highways provide more entertainment with citizens.
All in all, surging economy, higher employment rate and abundant recreation are the three main reasons why I choose the former option, to invest the roads and highways.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate wi 83
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 90
- For success in school and work the ability to adapt or adjust to a changing condition or circumstance is more important than having excellent knowledge of a job or a field to study 97
- You have received a gift of money. The money is enough to buy either a piece of jewelry you like or tickets to a concert you want to attend. Which would you buy? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ansportation, such as the efficiency of the commute, ways to improve highways and roads, co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this production' or 'those productions'?
Suggestion: this production; those productions
...ing demand on workers and directors for those production and manufactories. Apparently, this app...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35844155844 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06577140251 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.231663678 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.533333333 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219199677376 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746569425073 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045806440122 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11269302038 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589385213593 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.