In the wake of intense competition in academic field, a greatly increased number of parents concern about how to improve their children’s school work and it is also imperative for school to adopt a new mode of education to make the process with more efficiency. This gives rise to an earnest concern about whether the most important education for students should be conducted in the classroom. Some people render their support to this, but as far as I’m concerned, there are still other methods function well.
Admittedly, the education in classroom plays a more and more crucial role in the society. It is largely acknowledged that education is the key determinant of society. If children can obtain education with high quality, to some extent, they are granted to achieve their academic targets and posses the opportunities to have career advancement in the future. In this term, one of the most effective way to gain systematic knowledge is to study in the classroom on the grounds that the teachers, with more experiences and patience, will help you become equipped with knowledge at ease.
However, the deficiency of school education is also supposed to take into consideration. More and more people have been aware that this mode of education is killing some ability of students, such as the creativity and innovation. Beneficial though it is, many students just can’t assimilate the knowledge. They just memorize them, and once the exam ends, they will forget the relative knowledge as soon as possible. For instance, if a student only has a good command of how to get good grades instead of using the knowledge, the knowledge will do no benefit to the development of the whole society.
Finally, conducting education out of class can be conducive to students as well. It is a beneficial chance for student to digest what they have learned in the classroom, and only through this way can the assimilated theory be put into practice and become valuable to them. For example, there is a trend in university that many students are prone to have a part-time job. This is not only a very good way to earn money, but also a chance for them to use the knowledge in reality. Some of them may become teachers, tour guides, or even designer working for companies in the future. And the upside of this mode of education is obvious, it can assist them to prepare for the future career and find their real love from the bottom of the heart.
From what has been discussed above, we can safely draw a conclusion that having education in classroom is not the best mode for students, and if there is anyone out there who still wonders if this mode has drawbacks, who till doubts if outdoor education also provides students with a clear picture of the knowledge, this essay is my answer.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Newspapers and magazines are the best ways to learn about a foreign country 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept criticism from others cannot be successful at working in a group 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern days parents can learn more from their children than children can learn from their parents 86
- National governments can take a variety of actions to help protect the natural environment Which ONE of the following three actions do you think is MOST important for a nation s government to take to protect the natural environment and why Fund research t 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should not be allowed to play games 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, still, well, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 479.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85803757829 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68862891964 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484342379958 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6546685671 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.473684211 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2105263158 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331517750239 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104370617317 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122781161058 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184045105924 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691873675472 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.