Thanks to technological advancement, modern life has become significantly convenient year by year. Despite a brief history of smartphones, they have spread all over the world as an indispensable tool for communication and become familiar even with young children. Considering the negative impacts on those younger generations, I believe that parents should forbid young children from owning smartphones.
First, young children tend to be obsessed with playing with smartphones, compared to adults. Since young children are less likely to be mature enough to consider the negative impacts of smartphones, they have difficulty making decisions on their own. Without the restriction of the smartphone’s usage, they would spend too much time on gaming or watching online videos with the devices.
Second, smartphones expose young children to violence and crimes. Because the internet platforms provide easy access to making connections with various groups of anonymous people across borders, it is important to be aware of the danger of anonymity on the internet. Due to a lack of risk awareness, younger children are prone to trust anonymous people through online interactions. They might get involved in committing crimes or being kidnapped in case that the children make physical contact with the people.
Third, young children are not mature enough to handle those challenges of smartphones. Although smartphones help parents to contact their children for security reasons, it would be difficult for parents to monitor children’s smartphones use. The negative effects of smartphones outweigh the positive side as long as children cannot use them responsively. Therefore, parents should not allow their children to have smartphones until their children can make decisions based on rational and critical thinking to avoid the harmful effects of the devices.
In conclusion, I agree that parents need to prohibit young children from owing smartphones because children are more vulnerable to the negative effects of technology.
- R robustus 73
- Jane Austen 1775 1817 is one of the most famous of all English novelists and today her novels are more popular than ever with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies But we do not have many records of what she looked like For a long time the o 80
- The article discuses the paintings that Rembrant painted and it claims that they are doubts that it was painted by him But the professor challenges these points The first point that article makes is that the woman who was painted in Rembrants picture was 73
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internetaccess while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping intouch Which point of view do you think is better and why 76
- TPO 12 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, therefore, third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63071895425 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9622646316 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565359477124 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4992929228 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.866666667 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259327415634 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955073563839 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540010058057 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153857283902 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293478368361 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.