Some people prefer to work for a large company . Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice.

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to work for a large company . Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice.

Both working in a large company and working in small company are advantageous. However, small companies have limited opportunuties for improving capabilities. Thus, I prefer work in a large company as it is suitable for working global and it has various sectors to choose.

Firstly, It is believed that many big companies work global. They sign contracts with the other companies from even the other side of the world for sharing the works. This circumstance lets to employees to meet abroad and improve themselves by working with companies from the other countries. Therefore, since it improves capabilities and experiences of employees, working in a small company is weak for this side. For example, my uncle works for a huge company which products electronic stuffs. He always goes to abroad to sell them. He has, inherently, quite many experiences and he can work for any company that he wants because of his experiences.

Morever, since economical problems and abysmal vision, small companies can not spread to the other sectors. However, big companies always open for different sectors because they are strong as economical and motivation. That’s why big companies stand out as successful companies all the time. They always search for potential suitable sector to move on. They do not only work for one sector but they also tries to expand to another sector as well. Therefore, big companies supply to achieve experiences from different sectors to employees. There are many examples for small companies which have tried to improve the number of work areas but couldn’t manage it. However, when we take a look for successful companies, it is easy to realize that they are growing the numbers of sector that they work for.

On the whole, big companies are capable to be successfull comparing to the small ones. Eventually, I prefer working for big and successful companies since they give the chance of meet abroad and get experience from the other sectors.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-07 mukesh7541 70 view
2019-08-17 Anshuliv 73 view
2019-04-07 tamimadnan6240 83 view
2019-03-04 mkme 65 view
2018-04-04 Nadiyahemati 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user atilhan94 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both working in a large company and work...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd it has various sectors to choose. Firstly, It is believed that many big co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he wants because of his experiences. Morever, since economical problems and a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...xperiences. Morever, since economical problems and abysmal vision, small comp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'try'
Suggestion: try
... only work for one sector but they also tries to expand to another sector as well. Th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mbers of sector that they work for. On the whole, big companies are capable ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14241486068 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76915212145 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489164086687 0.524837075471 93% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4818121673 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.05 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34353625558 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130074857496 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085790152098 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261871424497 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780191691037 0.0645574589148 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.