Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?
They say that a person may become lost in tons of information. However, the different sources of information provide us with different points of view, including the views on the same object under the other angle, moreover the web share the additional blocks of data, which can help complete the whole picture and purely understand the topic. Hence, I firmly believe that internet plays an indispensable role by providing important reports.
Indeed, the view of others’ is a valuable thing, especially in the field of work with project under strict deadlines and in terms of time pressure, where global opinions and views under different angles matter. For example, the team working on a project obtains information from different sources such as meetings with other people, however nowadays we have a very strong and powerful tool to obtain information in a much smarter and fastest way. So, the data from the Internet may be used to acquire different views on the problem and provide the only viable solution. Only problem in here is that the Internet may accumulate information from unreliable sources, since we never know who is the author of the source.
By the same token, the valuable instructions obtained around the globe may act as a “final block” or “last detail of the puzzle”. To be specific, it is impossible for a person to know everything in the whole world. Since Internet is accessible to a wide range of users with completely different knowledge around the World, the complete data for each topic could be easily found on the web. Therefore, this depicts that in the modern era, internet lends us useful knowledge to get rid of the issues.
Furthermore, the misleading information may harm the researcher by making him to draw foolish conclusions, based on the lies. Detrimental effect from usage of wrong data could be uncountable. Mankind builds its future in twenty-first century, highly relying on the global data and web. Mostly, the sources from the Internet are available for changes from any unknown user, thus making it difficult to use data obtained from the global network. Wikipedia, one of the largest e-libraries, demonstrates the situation discussed above, in which a person writes a post or a story treating the facts in a wrong way, discouraging the general public from using the web.
In conclusion, the global web inculcates us meaningful data to get awareness about what is happening around us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-14 | ngaliulin | 76 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | rpinisetti8 | 86 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | usef | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | shiiwem | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-03 | Sudan Devkota | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnet is available to wide range of users with completely different knowledge arou...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... World, the complete data for each topic could be easily found on the web. Theref...
^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
...countable. Mankind builds its future in twenty first century, highly relying on the global d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...nkind builds its future in twenty first century, highly relying on the global data and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 390, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...correct facts, which are unavailable to general public, by using the global web. Mostly, the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 738, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...es a post or a story treating the facts in a wrong way, discouraging the general public from u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 771, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... facts in a wrong way, discouraging the general public from using the web.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04611650485 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70857582944 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541262135922 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4413057732 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213140498153 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641200031903 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557987348899 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133781570719 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836867983963 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.