Nobody can deny the fact and the truth that the environment plays a vitally important role in every person's life, and it is considered quite critical and crucial. Additionally, it is a worldwide known reality that the environment is a key factor that formulates the lifespan of all human beings. Based upon the all conducted statistics, studies and research, one may state that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Actually, I disagree with this viewpoint for so many varied and different reasons.
One reason is that plants and animals are the foundation of a healthy ecosystem. More than that, humans depend on the ecosystem for many reasons such as forests to purify the air, clean the water and protect people from the sun's harmful ultraviolet rays. For instance, the ecosystem provides the conditions for growing food.
Another reason is that plants and animals are responsible for varied useful medications. Undoubtedly, these species not only save our lives but also provide the raw materials for the pharmaceutical industry. For example, many scientists have introduced many deadly cancerous medicines for the help of plants and animals to save human lives. Furthermore, Humans are busy developing new things and destroying nature. If this continues, in future our children cannot experiences watching real endangered species and wild forests. Even animals have equal rights as we do.
Heading out of all previously mentions discussion, I can sum up and conclude that it is important saving land for endangered animals due to the fact that plants and animals are good for the healthy ecosystem as well as are significant for human beings. Several medicines today are from plants and roods. Also, the effective materials in them derivative from animals and special species.
- Has TV destroyed our life? 70
- TOEFL T P O 49 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 73
- Summarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage-four-day workweek. 81
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...plays a vitally important role in every persons life, and it is considered quite critic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, as for, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 52.1666666667 33% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 296.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27364864865 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75398766265 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577702702703 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9317403124 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5625 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298764323434 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893048052392 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863875706003 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182332112699 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542081444902 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.