Spending time with intelligent friends is better than the humorous persons? agree or disagree
The significance of the presence of one's friends in adding more flavor and lessening the hardship of life is not stealthy for anyone. Among a diversified constellation of perspective about how to opt for the friends to fulfill these goals, my penchant is more partial to prioritize the intelligent than the humorous persons. In spite of generating more positive and joyful ambiance due to the humorous ones, the intelligent friends can open new avenues of the triumph and perspective of the world. To demystify the hypothesis, three postulations can be proposed.
To converge on this notion, being aware of the impact of intelligent persons' actions on other individuals can be investigated cogently. Going into the depth, having recognized their adverse effects of behaviors, the smart persons may keep them away from themselves not to impress the adjacent persons negatively. To shed more light, the witty persons may pass the red lines in their speech and badger other persons by their assertions, in lieu of providing the humorous situation in which every one can feel ecstasy. Based on the scientific research in psychological province, the more the humans consider the moods and emotions of the persons who are residing close them , the less prevalence of painful feeling and anathema will be dominated in one environment.
Another angle endorsing this thesis is the perceptive persons scoping one information around various items. To put in general words, only when one can apply all dimensions and aspects of one issue discreetly and meticulously, does that person amplify the sense of accomplishment in other persons. For instance, the vast majority of smart persons are famous inventors that may be as a stimulus for other humans to set them as heroes in their lives, and to pursue their steps to reach a pinnacle of successes. Therefore, here the role of intelligent friends in thriving and nurturing the one can be sensed , additionally, who can ignore the importance of the innovative persons in gravitating the person in unearthing his talents and aptitudes .
To elucidate this theory, the latter outlook is that an intelligent human knows the place of other features such as sense of humor, honesty and helpful. To clarify, seldom does the person with these knowledge react impulsively and emotionally, and most of the times he follow the coherent and reasonable decision to halt the dire and destructive repercussions. For instance, the smart one comprehends that honesty is not always the best policy and in some situations is better to revise it in order not the hurt others' feeling.
Drawing upon the reasons, the benefits of selecting intelligent friends as one intimate friends are too enormous to fathom. To recapitulate the reasons, not only do they broaden one's horizon and teach the one how to reach effectively in sundry conditions, but also they may predispose other humans to actualize their ideals without leaving any negative fingerprints on other persons.
(515 words)
- Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school. Others say that children should make these decisions on their own. Which view do you agree with and why? 37
- about the musicians from the past and the present 83
- Prevalence of dinosaurs because of mass extinction 86
- fewer people attended super screen movies, in spite of existing a high quality, to overcome this problem is better to allocate a higher amount of budget on advertising to increase the awareness of persons about movies 48
- The study of history has value only to the extent that it is relevant to our daily lives 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
The significance of the presence of ones friends in adding more flavor and lesse...
^^^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... the persons who are residing close them , the less prevalence of painful feeling ...
^^
Line 5, column 604, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ving and nurturing the one can be sensed , additionally, who can ignore the import...
^^
Line 5, column 742, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... in unearthing his talents and aptitudes . To elucidate this theory, the latter...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...To clarify, seldom does the person with these knowledge react impulsively and emotionally, and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'follows'.
Suggestion: follows
...d emotionally, and most of the times he follow the coherent and reasonable decision to...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e the reasons, not only do they broaden ones horizon and teach the one how to reach ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, therefore, for instance, in general, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2525.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20618556701 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89797209096 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542268041237 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.739421546 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.529411765 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5294117647 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214577338228 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662856939876 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480339434494 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117898781924 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326247747769 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 86.8835125448 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.