Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.
Success depends on various factors. In this regard, some people think that in order to succeed one should try to do new things. Meanwhile, many others argue that taking risks is not the best way for achieving one's goals. Personally, I am prone to believe that we should always seek new things in our lives and should never be satisfied by what we have or what we know. I hold this opinion for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, trying new things allows us to gain knew knowledge and experince. Whenever we do something new, we learn how to do that, we try to forsee consequences of our actions, and so on. That in turn is the key to success. For instance, when I first started my career in a legal company, I knew my responsibilities very well, and did not have to work hard. However, I was always trying to do something new, to learn more. As a result, I was recognized as one of the best lawyers in the company. So, doing something new is a means to learn and become more experienced.
Also, doing new things helps us to maintain our success. Some people stop setting goals when they reach success. However, success may be temporary. So, if we stop doing new things, we may lose everything we have. My cousin's experience is a compelling example of this. When he graduated from university and found his first job, he stopped learning, setting new goals. As a result he lost his job and had to start everything from the beginning. Thus, setting goals and trying new things to achieve them is a necessary precondition for success.
To sum up briefly, if we want to be successful, we have to do new things /during/ all our lives. Its explanation is twofold: first, new things help us gain new knowledge and experience, and, second, they allow us to preserve our achievements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | thakannv | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | naziii | 86 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | sarah halawani | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | nusybah | 70 | view |
- Little Ice Age - the period between 1350 till 1900 C.E., when much of the surface of the Earth was susceptible to harsh winter conditions 80
- At present young people devote less time to helping their communities. 70
- This material addresses the question of whether ethanol fuel is a good alternative to gasoline in the Northern America. The reading passage suggests that the disadvantages of ethanol fuel outweigh its advantages. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes t 78
- This material addresses the question of the constant decline of the yellow cedar in the northern part of America during the last century. The reading passage suggests three main reasons that are responsible for killing the trees. 78
- Essay topics: TPO 49- Independent writingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new f 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...risks is not the best way for achieving ones goals. Personally, I am prone to believ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, while, for instance, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5487804878 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63865214227 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539634146341 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8658085111 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.8181818182 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9090909091 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335193256393 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095527263048 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691457454461 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204685737894 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302630604556 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 11.7677419355 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.