Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
The educational system has an important and vital impact on the student's life since they spend most of their time in school or university, and maybe we can consider teachers as role models for pupils. There is an issue that some people agree, some disagree. I am the one who agrees with the statement means that in my opinion Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. In this essay, I am going to explain three potential reasons to convince you.
First of all, as I mentioned above, I believe teachers are like heroes and role models for students because children believe they are educated and have a strong understanding of that stuff. As the result, the teacher should pay attention to what he or she says, and his or her acts in front of students. For example, when I was in high school, we had a teacher who mostly debates on political contents and she extensively influences student's beliefs and puts them in jeopardy.
Secondly, another thing is that when the teacher is aware of how he or she can influence their sight, the teacher prevents them from the right to thinking and searching. Every person has the right of thinking freely without any disruption. Imagine a society that everyone has the same sight and view about everything, what will happen? all of them just imitate each other without questioning about those topics and just follow others. This behavior may cause lots of problems and society won't flourish.
Least but not last, it is a well-established fact the children go to school to increase their knowledge. If the teacher talks about political things, he will waste the children’s time. And eventually, the children will lose their concentration in their lessons because of their teacher waste their valuable time with unimportant things.
In short, teachers are not experts to make an opinion and discuss politics and social issues. Definitely, teachers cannot do very well their task and will waste the time which has to spend on teaching about science and improve their knowledge. So, I firmly hold my opinion, it is not acceptable that teachers talk about their personal opinions about politics and social contents.
- For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 73
- Technological progress has made us lazy (Agree/disagree) 80
- Edmontosaurus survived the winter by migrating south to more hospitable regions 78
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 70
- To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...as an important and vital impact on the students life since they spend most of their tim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: All
...iew about everything, what will happen? all of them just imitate each other without...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, another thing, as to, for example, in short, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93010752688 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58849612223 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0290308269 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404687371202 0.236089414692 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113071425107 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137046710189 0.0737576698707 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208836030941 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982565960869 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.