Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom
In general, the statement is one of the major considerations of education systems. Some may hold the view that schooling may be better, if teachers do not make their views about some things like social or political. I, however, after thinking about direction on many occasions, decided to stand up in contrast with this view. I suppose providing the following reasons to support my idea is crucial.
The first important factor which comes to mind is that in this way students may know the world better. Since teachers explains their own ideas, children be aware of diversity of views in one concept. Hence, by these words, such a child learn variate of things during schooling times. I think that a small example can give some light. Imagine a boy who is learner at high school and his teacher argues the ideas about social problems. It would seem to me that such a student is able to know how is society conditions.
Another significant point involved in this issue is that information is power. Due to the fact that in this side teachers try to transmit his or her knowledge about other topics to students, learners may understand a lot of things which already were unknown for them. Therefore, it is significantly clear that some of these data may lead trainees to success and give them more chance to thrive. I guess there is not a better example than my friend who had a science teacher at secondary school. Her teacher always tried to talk about his life experiences in the classroom. Moreover, she could obtain a lot of information which lead her to gain a deep understanding with life career and finally she chose a good job.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by someone who believes that teachers should focus on only classroom objects. In these group's view, expressing teachers ideas may distract students from major points which they must learn at the school. In contrast, still I confirm that making coach's social or political ideas helps student's learning process. For example, I know a lot of children who pay attention to school courses because they love their teacher's perspective toward social difficulties.
In sum, from above discussed significant causes, reaching the conclusion that representing ideas by teachers in education system is essential, is marked.
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 86
- Young people nowadays dont give enough time to helping their communities. 86
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. 76
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 83
- In today's world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
...erations of education systems. Some may hold the view that schooling may be better, ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...cal ideas helps student's learning process. For example, I know a lot of children ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'for example', 'i guess', 'i suppose', 'i think', 'in contrast', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243181818182 0.229887763892 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.156818181818 0.158761421928 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0795454545455 0.0866891130778 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0295454545455 0.046263068375 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0590909090909 0.0685040099705 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.129545454545 0.118717715034 109% => OK
Participles: 0.025 0.0351676179071 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79656440553 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0295454545455 0.0309702414327 95% => OK
Particles: 0.00227272727273 0.00188951952338 120% => OK
Determiners: 0.0818181818182 0.0887237588012 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.025 0.0209618222197 119% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0204545454545 0.0139019557991 147% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2321.0 2387.08602151 97% => OK
No of words: 385.0 408.028673835 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02857142857 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.353246753247 0.338922669872 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275324675325 0.251872472559 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194805194805 0.174417080927 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119480519481 0.112833075102 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79656440553 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587012987013 0.524397521467 112% => OK
Word variations: 69.4641484065 59.2087087015 117% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3333333333 20.5533526081 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.41175006 48.84282405 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.523809524 120.699889404 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.5533526081 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.809523809524 0.644075263715 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 45.8658008658 45.7405998639 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.62037037037 1.45489161554 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336960644208 0.300154397459 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.061735490042 0.103427244359 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0524688622034 0.0752933317313 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.444567502622 0.497263757937 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156090491091 0.151897553556 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995301671425 0.114077575197 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689168901643 0.0781384742642 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.267149169872 0.336927656856 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0989655100407 0.067059652881 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203109348191 0.210909579961 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609605966335 0.0618886996521 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.75985663082 290% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.