Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Creativity is a vital tool for children to produce new ideas. In this world, having new ideas means being exist. Some people believe that children had more creativity in the past than they have today. Others disagree. I strongly assert that children possess more creativity nowadays for two main reasons.
Children have more access to the internet and ensuing new ideas. Internet is a source of connection, and people all around the world share their ideas by that. When you observe ideas, those affect your creativeness, and it can help you to produce more innovative ideas. In the past, children were deprived of such a facility. They had to create their ideas without knowing what ideas are trendy or which one came to the vogue. When I was in high school, we had an assignment that we had to write an essay about our country. After several hours of struggling with myself, eventually, I decided to obtain ideas on the internet. While I was looking at the prepared essays, I developed my idea. I wrote that essay perfectly; hence, I could not do that without the help of the internet.
Besides, there are more educational materials for children to develop their creativeness. Many parents are becoming more concerned about the future of their children. The Education system is aiming at fostering children with a more innovative mind, is becoming predominant in schools. In the past, nobody had such an obsession in children’s education, which parents have today. Following such concentration, children are becoming more creative and innovative.
Finally, nowadays, new ideas are more appreciated by people around the world. In this case, children are more willing to create innovative ideas. By using the internet and new technologies, everybody is able to produce his ideas and shares them with each other. Ideas that have not been seen by people, worth noting. Whenever the idea becomes spread by his creator, it gains more value.
To sum up the argument, children have more facility to share their ideas. In a world with advanced technologies and influent education systems, children are able to create new ideas and spread them easily. Children in the past did not have such an ability, which modern children have today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 80
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 71
- do you agree or disagree with the following question? in order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources. 68
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, hence, look, so, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03773584906 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63807742281 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498652291105 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8564522824 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.8846153846 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2692307692 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.96153846154 5.45110844103 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195154902946 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631249207905 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807789895461 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130048082162 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078276859441 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.