Television does not give people an accurate view of human nature.
During the 21st century, TV is still one of the most important ways to access information. TV channels do not give a correct approach of human nature. Nowadays, we realize that we watch what producers want to show us on TV. All that we see today has the TV professionals’ point of view. Additionally, natural human diversity and sponsor guidelines are more important than true news.
First, as a natural condition we have people’s influence in all TV programs. People who work on TV programs have guidelines, but they include information which is to their own advantage. When we figure out about what they are saying, it is clear that all news has their point of view.
Second, we live in a huge planet with population diversity. Sometimes we just have a small example about human’s natural complexity. Consequently, most of our information is from just a ridiculous small percentage of people.
Third, it is very normal that television has what sponsors want on their program’s schedule. As a result of monetary importance in modern society, all media must follow their sponsors’ rules. However, we still have some good options that do not show us just their perceptions.
To conclude, our modern world maintain television as an important source of information. Unfortunately, we have some minor problems that we live with. Due to professionals’ influence, people’s natural diversity, and sponsors’ believes, TV programs cannot give us an accurate view of human nature.
- It is more important to keep old friends than to make new friends 60
- Television does not give people an accurate view of human nature 66
- the sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast rapidly declining 90
- Which is more important for a leader the ability to win an argument about an issue or the ability to help others come to an agreement about an issue 61
- Do you agree with the following statement A person should never make an important decision alone 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
During the 21st century, TV is still one...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...important ways to access information. TV channels do not give a correct approach ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are more important than true news. First, as a natural condition we have pe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at all news has their point of view. Second, we live in a huge planet with po...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...diculous small percentage of people. Third, it is very normal that television...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not show us just their perceptions. To conclude, our modern world maintain t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, second, so, still, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 242.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20247933884 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08356676434 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578512396694 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.9377855762 48.9658058833 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.0588235294 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2352941176 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21824076964 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714309637345 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952611863004 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130099293514 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109682312837 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.