The majority of people who are in their early to mid-twenties think that in twenty years, people would use cars more than today. They support that without cars, people cannot live their lives. However, the notion does not reflect the stance that I hold and should be thought about in a different light. I believe that people would use fewer cars in use in twenty years. This is because today’s people in the world are concerned about the Earth’s environment and many technologies would be improved for the future.
First of all, people in today’s globalized world have seriously concerned about the Earth’s environment. To be specific, fewer cars will significantly reduce air pollution. This is directly correlated to the enhancement of our ecosystem, which is the foundation of our economies and societies. In fact, protecting the environment offers major opportunities for use to build a better future. For instance, a study done by the New York Times, it revealed that the increasing population of vehicle results in an environment where people could not survive without mask for air pollution. The study indicated that within ten years everyone could not breathe fresh air without portable air filter. This was because increasing vehicle population affect on contaminated air which as a result makes people to decrease their life span. Thus, it is legitimate to say that people would use fewer cars in use in twenty years in order to protect the environment.
Moreover, many technologies would be improved for the future instead of cars. As modern society is becoming increasingly dependent on technology, people in the world require companies to develop a lot of products in order to become convenient. For example, Google has experienced many researches regarding to driver-less car. From this company, many other companies also have tried to develop the car satisfying customer’s convenience. It will widespread throughout the world; thus, the car population also might be decreased by this technology. Consequently, today’s a number of cars will be decreased in twenty years by the improvement of technology.
To sum up, I believe that people would use fewer cars in use in twenty years because of two reasons : today’s people in the world are concerned about the Earth’s environment and many technologies would be improved for the future. All in all, the importance of my views cannot be underestimated in that it can kill two birds with the reasons I have mentioned. As a result, this trend will probably continue for the next generation.
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 33:Agree/Disagree:When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone. 76
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 73
- TOEFL T P O 44 Integrated Writing Task 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ironment offers major opportunities for use to build a better future. For instance,...
^^^
Line 2, column 749, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...s because increasing vehicle population affect on contaminated air which as a result make...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271805273834 0.229887763892 118% => OK
Verbs: 0.15415821501 0.158761421928 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0588235294118 0.0866891130778 68% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0405679513185 0.046263068375 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0304259634888 0.0685040099705 44% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139959432049 0.118717715034 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0466531440162 0.0351676179071 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03207231051 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243407707911 0.0309702414327 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00202839756592 0.00188951952338 107% => OK
Determiners: 0.0872210953347 0.0887237588012 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0365111561866 0.0209618222197 174% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00811359026369 0.0139019557991 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2591.0 2387.08602151 109% => OK
No of words: 417.0 408.028673835 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21342925659 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.37170263789 0.338922669872 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275779376499 0.251872472559 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20623501199 0.174417080927 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167865707434 0.112833075102 149% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03207231051 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465227817746 0.524397521467 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.5215940345 59.2087087015 85% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.9545454545 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6755720511 48.84282405 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.772727273 120.699889404 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9545454545 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.681818181818 0.644075263715 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 46.5324831044 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.03603603604 1.45489161554 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309394726888 0.300154397459 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133434732036 0.103427244359 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.123760585984 0.0752933317313 164% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.474757609458 0.497263757937 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.134814077895 0.151897553556 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126380507675 0.114077575197 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926153639846 0.0781384742642 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.456502518065 0.336927656856 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0568903720976 0.067059652881 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24574177604 0.210909579961 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542930069775 0.0618886996521 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.91756272401 224% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 9.0 2.75985663082 326% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.