TPO 07 independent
it is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.
Whether pupils ought to digest their majors' concepts or understand the facts has been a matter of argumentation among scholars for a long time. On one hand, some people accept that students must study conceptually since it is more beneficial for them. On the other hand, others assume that they should study the facts owing to the fact that it is more necessary for their future carriers. Personally, I concur with the former idea inspite of the fact that the latter one is more appealing and has more aficionados. My answer to this debating bone of contention is twoflod. In the following, the rationale behind my choice will be elaborated by the most outstanding, solid proofs.
The first and foremost explanation which is worth mentioning is that students can develop their own ideas and improve their critical-thinking skills by merely understanding the concept of their studies. Researchers of RMIT, a well-known university in Australia, conducted a survey of gradutaed students in Melbourne universities among whom they disseminated a questionnaire and realized that there is a direct exponential relation between their level of critical-thinking and their ability of understanding the concepts; in other words, the more they tried to learn the concepts, the more critical-thinking skills they have. To put it into a more vivid picture, my cousin who is graduated from Melbourne University had a supervisor who always encouraged him to leave the facts and try to learn the concepts; therefore, today, my cousin is a great entrepreneur who is acknowledged for his great brainstorming skills in his business. Conversely, my brother usually wanted to understand the facts, so he is unable to improvies ideas even though he is good at recalling scientific principals, but this ability is not enough and accepted in today's competitive world.
The second and equally far-reaching justification is that with this mindset students can easily distinguish between profitable and useless presuptions in their real lives. When individuals focuse on the facts, they will no longer need to challenge themsleves by understanding the facts, so they can spend more time on the improvement of their ideas. For instance, my coworker always told me to try new things even if I am not fully competent it that. he usually claimed that he knew every software related to civil engineering even though he was not completely skilled in it because he belieced that as he knows the concept of engineering, learning the instructions of a software will not hinder him from doing his tasks. In contrast, I always thought that I have to know all of the facts of a major in order to work properly.
In coclusion, taking all of the abovementioned rationalizations into account, I agree with the idea of understanding the concepts, rather than wasting my time on learning the facts. Stills, as this concept has mutually exclusive hypotheses, neither my personal opinion must be accpeted globally, nor do others must feel sad if my assuption is not aligned with their.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | nilav | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | Rasika0511 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | MotherAstronaut | 65 | view |
- carved stone balls 71
- TOP 27 integrated What caused the Little Ice Age 1 disrupted ocean currents 2 volcanoes eruption 3 indirect effect of humans activities 80
- TPO 22 integrated Ethanol is as like as gasoline with no benefits 80
- life on venus can be possible in a floating station above its surface 73
- The disadvantages of reducing work hours 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 452, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...en if I am not fully competent it that. he usually claimed that he knew every soft...
^^
Line 9, column 773, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...t, I always thought that I have to know all of the facts of a major in order to work prope...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 22, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ork properly. In coclusion, taking all of the abovementioned rationalizations into ac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 253, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...tually exclusive hypotheses, neither my personal opinion must be accpeted globally, nor do other...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, in contrast, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2558.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15725806452 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12725464971 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526209677419 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.2420964386 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.470588235 100.406767564 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1764705882 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243441636182 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763455210866 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560539274062 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150382174182 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408116644611 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 11.7677419355 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.