People could not imagine their life without their friends, teachers, and family. Some people believe that children influenced more by their teachers rather than friends. Nevertheless, others think the exact opposite of it. From my point of view, friends impact an individual more than anyone else for the following reasons.
Above all, students spend most of their time with friends. Moreover, they respect and trust their friends more than some temporary teachers. Because some teachers are not valuable for them, students not really listen to their piece of advice even though how old they are. On the other hand, students get the advice of their friends abruptly because friends are the people who can share a secret with each other. From my own experience, I accept an advice from my loved ones such as friends without any trouble. Nonetheless, every year my foreign language teacher alters with no reason and their advice not influence me at all because they do not know me well, they have been in my life for less than a year.
Furthermore, friends have a similar perspective on life. People who have the same altitude know and understand each other more than anyone else. For example, most siblings fight a lot because they compete with each other all the time. However, they will be on each other's side when everyone is on the other side. Even though how competitive they are, siblings know each other well. Moreover, I believe that the only thing that holds two different people together is personality.
All in all, people can conclude the person from his or her friends because each individual influenced by their friends every moment they spend together. Even though people respect teachers a lot, they cannot be special like friends.
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration of any relationship.Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'advice'.
Suggestion: advice
...other. From my own experience, I accept an advice from my loved ones such as friends with...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fferent people together is personality. All in all, people can conclude the pers...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, so, well, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 293.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99317406143 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32755497108 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532423208191 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9395926659 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2777777778 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2777777778 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190625263074 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737989008191 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729907785405 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134721555022 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839491321007 0.0645574589148 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.