Admittedly, public awareness regarding educational subjects and teacher's role have significantly increased over the last decades. While some people have argued that instructors' opinion in different topics like political and social ones have to be concealed due to its aftermaths, others believe that it can benefit students in a number of ways. To the best of my knowledge, the former view outweigh the latter one based on the following concerns.
There is a little room for doubt that the main function of any teaching institutions is to provide information in assigned courses. In fact, teachers should concentrate on imparting those information accounts which have been known as school-learning curriculum. Hence, teachers' remarking about others subjects not only can be confusing but also it consumes student their valuable amount of time. In fact, student less ability to realize deep connotation related to presidential election, as an example, might bored them, in turn, their time can be allocated to educational issue or interesting one.
Moreover, students, especially at younger age, are vulnerable while getting informed from different occurrences in their surrounding area. In most occasions, they might harbor biased perception toward a specific issue in politics or society and consequently, act impulsively based on their teacher's opinion. Consider a situation, when a teacher declares his idea in politics openly. Students harbor different positions toward teachers' mindsets without any consideration but based on their relationship with their teachers. Hence, controversial statements might mislead students and impair teaching process thoroughly.
On the other hand, there has been some occasions which freedom in teacher's speaking have its own redeeming features. First, student's intervention in other materials convey democratic concept. In fact, free discussion might help them to realize that how to deal with adverse political or social setting. In addition, it has played a pivotal role in broadening their horizon and as a result, both their mental ability and intellectual skill can be flourished. Last but not least, students 'self-confidence will certainly boost if they experience a real situation with the onset of both positive and negative thoughts.
From what have been discussed, the demerits of teacher's opinion disclosure might adversely affect students' learning process. As it was mentioned, not only is it time-consuming and confusing but also might mislead them. However, some free discussion can benefit student mental abilities.
- The function of science is to reassure; the purpose of art is to upset. Therein lies the value of each. 75
- TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Typically, as people age, their bone mass decreases, making them more vulnerable to bone fractures. A recent study concludes that the most effective way to reduce the risk of fractures in later life is to take twice the recommended dose of vitamin D and c 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'instructors'' or 'instructor's'?
Suggestion: instructors'; instructor's
...des. While some people have argued that instructors opinion in different topics like politi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 117, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...ight adversely affect students learning process. As it was mentioned, not only is it ti...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243619489559 0.229887763892 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.160092807425 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113689095128 0.0866891130778 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0417633410673 0.046263068375 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0510440835267 0.0685040099705 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113689095128 0.118717715034 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0672853828306 0.0351676179071 191% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.0055259165 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0208816705336 0.0309702414327 67% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0626450116009 0.0887237588012 71% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.030162412993 0.0209618222197 144% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0116009280742 0.0139019557991 83% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2579.0 2387.08602151 108% => OK
No of words: 385.0 408.028673835 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.6987012987 5.86048508987 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.451948051948 0.338922669872 133% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.376623376623 0.251872472559 150% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.303896103896 0.174417080927 174% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.192207792208 0.112833075102 170% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0055259165 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594805194805 0.524397521467 113% => OK
Word variations: 71.1538889819 59.2087087015 120% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.25 20.5533526081 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.137121024 48.84282405 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.95 120.699889404 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.5533526081 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.644075263715 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 56.9123376623 45.7405998639 124% => OK
Elegance: 1.67889908257 1.45489161554 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294879507544 0.300154397459 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0542285366224 0.103427244359 52% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0399511321748 0.0752933317313 53% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.448402090663 0.497263757937 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.098693276666 0.151897553556 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905612900947 0.114077575197 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516766763855 0.0781384742642 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.219437321325 0.336927656856 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0375648812895 0.067059652881 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174994198077 0.210909579961 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585855655623 0.0618886996521 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.