TPO 23
It goes without saying that in today's world, every person has alot of work to do and every body is in hurry. While some people believe it is necessary to do the works swiftly and take the risk of problematic consequence, the others hold the view that it is better to work calmly and assure the correct consequence. Personally, I concur with the former group's viewpoint. The reasons substantiating my point of view are explored in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, in today's hustle and bustle world which one should compete with others in the every aspects of life if they want to progress in their life, they should work quickly and risk the consequences. To elaborate, nowadays, people study hard to increase their level of the education to attain a well-paid job in the future and after they find a good job they work hard and quick to gain the satisfaction of their boss. So, if one do their responsibility so slowly they cannot satisfy their boss to promote. So, doing every thing so quickly has a pivotal role in the success of every persons.
Furtheremore, if one do something repetitious they become expert in that skill. As a result, after some failure the risk of the consequences will be decreased. For example, in the university I should lecture for a course every week but I did not have enough time to get ready for the lecture every week. So, I decided to improvise it. In the early weeks my lectures was awful but it did not undermine my confidence and the next weeks I had become a expert lecturer and do it without any prepration.
As shown above, considering all the reasons and views above, one could conclude that it is better to do your tasks quickly. It is because it is a necessary need for success and after a while the risks will be gone down.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-06 | Pooja dave | 76 | view |
| 2020-06-01 | Pooja Sam | 77 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 90 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 90 | view |
| 2020-02-17 | DaVa20011218 | 80 | view |
- TPO 50 3
- tpo 28 60
- TPO 21 3
- TPO 55: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...e. Personally, I concur with the former groups viewpoint. The reasons substantiating m...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to gain the satisfaction of their boss. So, if one do their responsibility so slowly t...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 448, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...fidence and the next weeks I had become a expert lecturer and do it without any p...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, while, for example, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 320.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61449535045 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7954199634 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.