We are now living in a fast pace world. It seems that everything should be down quickly to meet the pace of others. However the wage of our high pace economy is the risk of mistakes. As those tiny mistakes would eventually lead to bigger and long lasting problems to our society, I think that it would be better to slow down our speed to make sure everything is correct. The pros and cons will be discussed below.
First, the tiny mistakes would eventually lead to bigger problems. Pollutions left by our ancestor from the quick paced urbanization have been influenced our country for decades. We are still paying the bills of those mistakes. For instance, our government had to spend ample amount of money to purify the water and air. If we continue to sacrifice the environment, the so-called tiny mistakes, to the fast growth economics, our predecessors would have a worse living situation in the foreseeable future.
Second, the slow development is more sustainable. Our fast-paced urbanization burdened our environment not only by the pollutions but also by the over-use of resources. Especially when there are high profits in selling resources. For example, when the char and coal price was high, the coal mines in central China was over developed by the greedy human. And those mines eventually ran out of coal. While the generation of coal took thousands of years, it only spent us one decade to dig them up. No wonder our predecessors would be forced to find renewable energy.
All in all, as those reasons pointed above, the quick pace work in any region is no good than living trifle mistakes and leads to bigger problems such as energy crises. We should slow our pace down, and make sure that everything is correct, including our environmental is sustainable as usual.
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 85
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...own quickly to meet the pace of others. However the wage of our high pace economy is th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, while, for example, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86885245902 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66435759565 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560655737705 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3729909929 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1578947368 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0526315789 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101379152208 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298943552364 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385649708357 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760537435982 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618662865441 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.