When thinking about the issue that currently it is more crucial to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct, varied individuals will have diverse ideas. Some citizens claim that the competition nowadays is more fierce than it was previously, so we need to work quickly to enhance our working efficiency. However, from where I stand, people should work slowly to make sure their outcomes are airtight, thus can pave a solid way for their future career.
First and foremost, a good result or a masterpiece need adequate time to revise and perfect. To tackle a difficult task always requires us to posses ample expertise and experience, which without enough time is impossible to achieve. Take my grandfather who is a playwright as an example, and he has composed several illustrious drama. I remember that once he was writing a new play, it took him a half year to finish it. During that period he referred to several literature books and watched far more plays to find the fodder and inspiration. Finally, he did a great job and his drama enjoyed a good reverberation. Ideal achievement usually accompanies plenty effort and commitment, and if we pursue the efficiency excessively, we cannot finish a thing well.
Furthermore, it will presumably make more mistakes when people handle a thing impatiently, therefore, may bring severe consequence. Handle a job quickly usually means more flaws and defects will happen since people are not able to correct all the mistakes in their works within limited time, and sometimes this would lead to a tremendous economic loss. In this way, people who in charge this task may lose their jobs and even affect their future career. For instance, my friend Lisa is extremely impetuous that she virtually finishes everything in a short time. Once she was verifying the expenditure of an activity, and she completed it in one hour. Guess what, she made a huge mistake, then her company lose considerable money and she had to quit the job. As a result, if we work quickly and risk making mistakes, we may encounter the unpredictable consequence it brings.
In a nutshell, not only does it need us devote our all heart and mind to the task we are tackling to make it unblemished, but also it may bring more defects when we work quickly. So I strongly endorse working slowly to assure everything is right.
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 90
- The effectiveness of cloud seeding. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage. 81
- Your school want to improve the quality of students' life in the dormitory. Which one of the following do you think the school should build in dorms? 1.Quiet study area 2.exercise room for students to keep physical well-being3.room for entertainment 73
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 76
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89215686275 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74297449376 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575980392157 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7152994114 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.052631579 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261532631617 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740106845617 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851500726052 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1711290462 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103375459337 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.