There have always been heated discussions on how long people should work to be most satisfied. Some might contend that it is better to work only three days a week for long hours because people can have more time to relax and they do not need to work. However, I would like to say that working for five days per week with shorter hours are more enjoyable in terms of stress, pressure and the quality of work.
First and foremost, it is undeniable that nowadays many work can be quite laborious both inside and outside office. Though working for longs hours and fewer days seems to give people more time to get away from work, it actually put people under much stress and pressure, so their health can be undermined in the long run. For instance, many works today are accomplished on computers, and sitting in front of the desk and staring at the screen can have adverse effect on people's eye-sight and cause severe discomfort in back, which can be a problem years later. Drivers, as another example, are not expected to work continuously for long hours, in order to prevent them from fatigue and distraction.
Secondly, working for too long may make people get bored in what they are doing, which in turn affect the quality of their work. Typically, in jobs that require precision and concentration, like accountants or doctors, workers must pay full attention to their work, which can be exhausting. Thus, it is not uncommon for people in these fields to get bored and tired after a day's work. And if they work for even longer hours a day, the quality of their work will definitely drop, causing damages to employees' benefits. Thus, working three days a week for long hours is also detrimental to employees.
Admittedly, it is justifiable for some who argues that working for longer hours and fewer days a week can give people more freedom, and they can have better relaxation and be more prepared for a new week. Nonetheless, I still affirm that even like this, the total hour of work weekly does not change, so people are simply sacrificing their nights in exchange for two more days in "weekend". But in this way they lose the time to enjoy the evenings with their families. In fact, they may not have the time to have a good dinner with their family members.
Due to aforementioned ground, I firmly believe that people should not work for long hours and only three days a week, and stress, pressure and lower quality of work are two prime reasons.
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 83
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 83
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 76
- Nature\'s Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature\'s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas wh 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun work seems to be countable; consider using: 'many works'.
Suggestion: many works
...oremost, it is undeniable that nowadays many work can be quite laborious both inside and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 435.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68735632184 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48067814065 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491954022989 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3456413554 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.941176471 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5882352941 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359375572643 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151954148379 0.076458572812 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861252076408 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251976086121 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671961034936 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.