TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec

When comes to work there so many factor which gives happiness to worker like bonus, extra pay, medical benefits and working hours. If, we pick up the working hours alone as criteria for our happiness then how many hours we are working does not matter, how many weak off we can avail that most important. So, working for longer time and getting more week off seems like more benefits. But the fact is entirely different from what we thinking.

Fist of all, like coin has two ends, working shorter hour or longer hours has it's own merits and demerits. First, I want to explore some advantages of shorter working hours. For example, someone working for 12 hours a day and taking three week off, then the person can enjoy the week off with his/her family and they will have very good refreshment that makes them works efficiently.

Secondly, we reduced the absent, for example when they plenty of time then wont take unnecessary leaves. They will work loyally. Whereas, short off like two days week off that may leads them to take more leaves and absents because they do not find the enough offs for their personal work so they feel very sad.

Thirdly, the workers working for long time and having plenty offs they need not go special vacation because already they are their trips during the three days week off. That, promote the worker to do the work infavor of company that is additional benefits for the company which makes lots of profits.

Fourthly, the disadvantage of the long week off is worker become more tired when they working around the clock which makes employee sick. For example, when it happens worker may suffer from physical, mental and social problems like mental depression, lack of motivation and less social interaction every day life. Further, in the long term worker lose their interest and they will think about their own benefits that leads reduces their productive. For instant, they spend their time in unwanted activities like gambling and going to bar often.

Finally, when comes to regular work hours and the offs there is some merits are there like worker works in uniform pattern no less, no more which maintain their mind and body well manner. For example, someone working today's working hours norms then he does not work for long hour working like 12 hours or something and further he gets two that more than sufficient for worker. This maintain balance between mental and physical stability.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun factor seems to be countable; consider using: 'many factors'.
Suggestion: many factors
When comes to work there so many factor which gives happiness to worker like bo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from what we thinking. Fist of all, like coin has two ends, working shorter ...
^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...ing for 12 hours a day and taking three week off, then the person can enjoy the week...
^^^^
Line 10, column 521, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime in unwanted activities like gambling and going to bar often. Finally, when...
^^
Line 12, column 56, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some merits'?
Suggestion: there are some merits
...omes to regular work hours and the offs there is some merits are there like worker works in uniform ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... between mental and physical stability.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'whereas', 'for example']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232104121475 0.229887763892 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.147505422993 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0997830802603 0.0866891130778 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0759219088937 0.046263068375 164% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0650759219089 0.0685040099705 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106290672451 0.118717715034 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0390455531453 0.0351676179071 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.11561315131 2.67179642975 79% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0151843817787 0.0309702414327 49% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00433839479393 0.00188951952338 230% => OK
Determiners: 0.056399132321 0.0887237588012 64% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151843817787 0.0209618222197 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0325379609544 0.0139019557991 234% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2458.0 2387.08602151 103% => OK
No of words: 418.0 408.028673835 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88038277512 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.306220095694 0.338922669872 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.224880382775 0.251872472559 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.117224880383 0.174417080927 67% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0574162679426 0.112833075102 51% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.11561315131 2.67179642975 79% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50956937799 0.524397521467 97% => OK
Word variations: 56.9953656155 59.2087087015 96% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8727705277 48.84282405 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.368421053 120.699889404 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.736842105263 0.644075263715 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.5376344086 132% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.54480286738 108% => OK
Readability: 44.4880382775 45.7405998639 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.30827067669 1.45489161554 90% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226104805239 0.300154397459 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108166440571 0.103427244359 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0847249275478 0.0752933317313 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528354044849 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141090069477 0.151897553556 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863425053121 0.114077575197 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464369634363 0.0781384742642 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.312975486331 0.336927656856 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0550321805188 0.067059652881 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148093420174 0.210909579961 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294090086456 0.0618886996521 48% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.