TPO 30Agree/Disagree: It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

The job plays a vital role in the daily activities of human's lives. It is necessary for an individual's personal development too. Some argue that working long hours for three days are more comfortable working schedule for the people. While others have the opposite idea that working in a regular schedule is always a better option. From my perspective, the latter view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.

Primarily, having a job which has a regular schedule can let us easily match with others' schedule. On the contrary, if a person who works three days for long hours, would get less time to spend with his family and friends. As a result, that person may not balance his work life along with his family life which may create major conflicts in his life. My own brother has a compelling example of this situation. He has been working in the shipping company since last one year where he spends 15 hours every day, and because of his busy work schedule, it has started conflicts with his wife. When everyone else spends their time with their family, my brother is working in the company. Fortunately, he has decided to switch the job to another place where he would have free time to spend with his family.

Secondly, people who have a normal working schedule, are more active in their life. Whereas, working for a long time in a day may reduce the ability to work. To illustrate this, researchers from the University of Los Angeles have found that people who have long working hours, will easily get tired after few hours because their brain will stop working if they would work more than eight hours. Also, it reduces the productivity of the human's brain. As a result, employees cannot work efficiently and effectively. Thus, working for long hours may have negative in an individual's life.

Furthermore, regular job makes a people’s life healthier and the person would feel energetic in his day to day activity. On the contrary, working for three days may create laziness among the people when they have day-off from the workplace. Consequently, they would adapt a sedentary lifestyle which is not good for their own health. For instance, the people who have been working for an average of eight hours every day would have a stable daily routine life. They wake up in the early morning and finish their work at 5:00 pm. After the work, they may go to the gym for a workout and sleep earlier. The appropriate sleep length and exercising every day would benefit them in order to have a mentally and physically healthy body. Therefore, a regular job is more suitable for people.

In summation, I strongly believe that it is a more effective way to work for more days for a short duration of time. This is because people can work efficiently at their workplace, and because of having a regular working schedule, they can balance their personal life as well as their work.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...es of humans lives. It is necessary for an individuals personal development too. Some argue th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rtable working schedule for the people. While others have the opposite idea that work...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... for long hours may have negative in an individuals life. Furthermore, regular job makes...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, as a result, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77799607073 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46987398856 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444007858546 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3740492231 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8620689655 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5517241379 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41379310345 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38772845109 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12185821631 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863687198069 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259614545973 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515408651692 0.0645574589148 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.