TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Most people are for the opinion that, finding a secure job which ensures you of a successful future is easier today compared to the past. However, I believe that finding a job which guarantees the mentioned features is harder these days. There are two main reasons for this claim, which I will elaborate on through the ensuing paragraphs.

Firstly, various job opportunities make the process of a job choosing extremely difficult. This rule can be applied to different decision-making processes not only while finding a job. There are thousands of companies and institutes today which you can occupy a job position there. Hence, identifying the job that best matches your criteria can be difficult. To illustrate, imagine that you need to buy a dress. It is way more difficult to find a dress in a big store rather than choosing one between a few choices. It is approximately the same when it comes to finding a job. For instance, there were few job positions available in the past; Farming, teaching and some more. Therefore, people could simply identify which job can bring success to their lives. Nevertheless, there are plenty of jobs today that we have not even heard about. This clearly makes it hard to find an appropriate job.

Secondly, the appearance of private companies and individuals who run businesses adversely affect the process of job finding. If someone wants to find a job, they can easily obtain information about well-known companies or the ones who are administrated by the government. They have clear rules that you can see whether they match your expectations. However, today there are various job opportunities that are controlled by private companies. You may find the conditions of the job rational at first and accept the position, but they may change the rules and terms after a while. For instance, my father took a job in one of these private companies. During the first year, he was completely satisfied with his job and the wage. Yet, the next year all the previous rules changed and he had to spend more hours in the company with the same salary as before. He has also experienced having a secure job in a well-known company which was dependent on the government and he used to be more satisfied and I can remember how successful he was at that job.

In summation, by considering the creation of new job positions and private companies it can easily result that identifying a satisfactory job which makes you feel secure and successful, is harder than before. Consequently, to find a job which matches your criteria it is beneficial to spend more time looking for job positions.

Votes
Average: 9 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89887640449 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82014324606 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501123595506 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9083948486 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149715114723 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511501308099 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294678977875 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105537169118 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00609547883558 0.0645574589148 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.