When we talk about satisfactions, we usually talk about a sense of fulfilment and self-actualisation. Most of us gain those feeling in work, some people feel more satisfied with doing similar tasks all day long, indeed, we have to admit that similar tasks are less challenging for an experienced worker. However, I am agreeing with the statement that people feel more satisfied when they have different types of tasks to do.
Employees who are able to deal with different types of tasks are more competitive in job market than those only do similar tasks all day long. Therefore, they will have more opportunities to get promotion and receive higher salary than the average. Consequently, they will gain more satisfaction from work. For example, Facebook only hires full-stack developers, since they think a good programmer should have the ability to fulfil their tasks in different areas as well as the ability to learn knowledge in a short time. We all know that Facebook offers good salary to their employees, so when you gain more profit from work, you can spend more money on entertainments or shopping, hence live a life with more happiness.
For those who enjoy taking challenging in their work, a job with different kinds of tasks is more appealing, since they may think doing similar tasks repeatedly is too boring. For instance, as a student major in software engineering, I spend a lot of time reading documents of different technics in my area in order to use them building things which I want. A job with similar tasks such as maintaining the server or fixing hardware error of a computer absolutely can not make me satisfied.
Regarding to scientists' study, our brain have different parts and each part is response to different kinds of function. Therefore, it is reasonable for us to believe that doing similar tasks repeatedly leads to the overuse of some specific part of our brain, which will make ourself feel tired more easily. When we doing different tasks, some part of our brain is working while others can have a rest, so we can feel less tired in work.
In conclusion, for one thing, different types of tasks is benefit for employees to enhance their competitive in job market, thus, leading a feeling of fulfillment in their work. Also, for those kind of people who quickly gets bored with similar tasks, a challenging job offers more kinds of tasks is a better choice towards them. Finally, Having different types of tasks to do will somehow make people feel less tired.
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 60
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...g for an experienced worker. However, I am agreeing with the statement that people feel mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 189, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...of fulfillment in their work. Also, for those kind of people who quickly gets bored with s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'finally', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'such as', 'as well as', 'for one thing']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231422505308 0.229887763892 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.15923566879 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101910828025 0.0866891130778 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0636942675159 0.046263068375 138% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0658174097665 0.0685040099705 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133757961783 0.118717715034 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0424628450106 0.0351676179071 121% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70496696925 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0297239915074 0.0309702414327 96% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0658174097665 0.0887237588012 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0212314225053 0.0209618222197 101% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0191082802548 0.0139019557991 137% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2506.0 2387.08602151 105% => OK
No of words: 426.0 408.028673835 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88262910798 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.291079812207 0.338922669872 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227699530516 0.251872472559 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.157276995305 0.174417080927 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12441314554 0.112833075102 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70496696925 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471830985915 0.524397521467 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.7693926644 59.2087087015 87% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0588235294 20.5533526081 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3898398325 48.84282405 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.411764706 120.699889404 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0588235294 20.5533526081 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.17647058824 0.644075263715 183% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 47.8287765811 45.7405998639 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.41176470588 1.45489161554 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378197935517 0.300154397459 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124050911933 0.103427244359 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0745471700542 0.0752933317313 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.559388037915 0.497263757937 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.105823884165 0.151897553556 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15987661791 0.114077575197 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854419553577 0.0781384742642 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.319880289336 0.336927656856 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0226021127426 0.067059652881 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251867307011 0.210909579961 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747670952387 0.0618886996521 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.