A job plays an important role in our lives. It is believed that whether or not our lives will be successful and comfortable depend on our jobs. However, what kinds of job we do also take a significant part on a workday. Therefore, people raise the question do people feel more gratified when they have many different types of tasks to do during a workday than when they have to do one task entire day? People have their own preferences and opinions about this issue. In my point of view, I totally believe that having various kinds of tasks is more enjoyable for workers. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, doing many tasks per day brings people more interesting. Obviously, sometimes we feel so bored when doing over and over again only one job, especially, when we have to stay in one place. In this situation our minds will be less active. They lead us to feel tired and cannot concentrate on our job. My own experience is a compelling example of this case. Three years ago, I worked as an accountant for a company. All day long I just worked on a computer with a number of documents and numbers. At first I worked quite well. However, after that I got a lot of stress. I could not focus on my job. Therefore, I quit that job.
Alongside the elaborated reason above, another idea that is noteworthy to consider is that doing many tasks allow people to discover many new things and gain a lot of knowledge. It is no doubt, knowledge is infinite. The more we learn, the more we want to know more. Therefore, if you are able to do many tasks, you will learn more new things. You can have a lot of experience as well. Thus, you can handle many situations in your job and your lives.
In conclusion, people have different opinions about the issue whether having many tasks to do a day is more satisfied workers. For two aforementioned reasons, I completely agree that it is true.
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 60
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 78
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- 74.Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leaderships come naturally. One cannot learn to be better. Use specific reasons to support your answer. 66
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... role in our lives. It is believed that whether or not our lives will be successful and comfor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ople feel more gratified when they have many different types of tasks to do during a workday t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, i feel, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45224719101 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5258463828 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511235955056 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4093880064 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.9615384615 100.406767564 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6923076923 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357121157041 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763110123338 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116113292437 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224960728157 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583295663934 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.4 11.7677419355 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 58.1214874552 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.1575268817 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.94 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.72 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.