disagree
-allow them to pursue to become expert-improve as an individual
-tiring-engaging to catch up all the materials-the efficiency of work is more
The money, happiness and every enjoyable thing come from the result of work. Some people believe that it more engaging to do many different types of job in a day. Nevertheless, others think doing similar tasks is the best way to work. From my point of view, it is beneficial for both the company and an individual worker, to do the same thing in a work.
Above all, such work type encourage the workers to improve themselves. Also, only a consistent person can succeed in a real life. I think the broad range of experience in a various field is not necessary to be an expert on one specific field. Moreover, do similar tasks every day makes the person feel more familiar with it and brings them confidence that they can do it whenever and wherever it is. From my personal experience, when I study for the exam, I prefer to study on it alone because this helps me to concentrate on it better and also easy to get a deeper understanding about that single subject. In contrast, when I try to study for two different exams such as geography and history, it becomes really hard and inconvenient to study them at all. As a result, I usually failed on both exams.
Another reason is, the efficiency of work will higher if a person only does similar tasks of work in a day. Because it is easy to concentrate and correct the mistakes because you have to worry about only one thing, not many. Moreover, workers spend less time confusing and tiring when they have an only one task to do because it is more engaging and familiar with them. For instance, researchers find that if the workday decreases to four from five, a chance of workers to develop decreases. Because when workers have less time doing a similar task, their efficiency and concentration decrease. So, the result of performing many tasks is harmful to both the worker and the company.
All in all, because the development of a worker's ability to improve depends on what work they do. Furthermore, the pros of doing similar tasks outweigh the cons.
- TOEFL TPO 10 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 76
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?An ability of read and write is more important today than in the past.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Disagree
disagree -allow them to pursue to become expert...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ple believe that it more engaging to do many different types of job in a day. Nevertheless, ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ll in all, because the development of a workers ability to improve depends on what work...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, for instance, i think, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6832460733 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70105442732 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497382198953 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2175374715 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1578947368 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332157941111 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111829717231 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881981785757 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162592847022 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105710646706 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.