It is important that the relationship between students and the teacher be friendly. Similarly, the relationship between people involved a meeting is very important. Sometimes, people get upset because of something insignificant. We should try our best not do or say something that others might not like or even get upset of. So, in cases that we are interacting with sensitive people, we should be more conscious of what we are going to do or say. In some cases, you might notice a mistake in ones speech or lecture. Depending on how much we are certain about the mistake, the importance of the mistake, and the person who made it, we should act differently. But I am going to the most widely used and prefered method of mine. Wait until the class or meeting is over.
I personally think that it is the best action to go for. Because, when you mention a mistake in person, without interrupting or making him/her shy or maybe angry, it is more likely to be accepted. For example, in the third semester of my undergraduate study, I noticed that the professor made a terrible mistake without being aware of what he did. One of the students, told the teacher he was wrong. But the teacher, not only didn't accept the student's claim, but also made him shy in front of others. After the class, I went to talk to the teacher and told him he was wrong. He said he would double check his saying but probabely nothing would change. The next session, the professor came to the class. The first thing he mentioned was his mistake.Then thanked me for making him to double check the problem. But the professor was still mad at the student who first mentioned the mistake.
Most of the time, It is wrong to say nothing. Because, if the mistake is serious, it might have unrecoverable consequences. Especially in work meetings. Not saying anything is a very bad idea when it comes to mistakes affecting an important point, or wide variety of people or students. So, it is always better to mention the mistake. Interrupting is also a very bad idea as in many cases, can lead to unintentional humiliation of the speaker which is not good. Talking to the speaker right after the session, is probabely the most effective way to do the job, a duty, which proved to be very important to be done in most cases.
- instead of / United States / cloud seeding / cloud seeding / silver iodide / instead of / cloud seeding / cloud seeding / water vapor / freezing point / silver iodide / cold water / water vapor / instead of / cloud seeding / cloud seeding / cloud seeding 73
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 70
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 74
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 27
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.Use 57
Sentence: But I am going to the most widely used and prefered method of mine.
Error: prefered Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: He said he would double check his saying but probabely nothing would change.
Error: probabely Suggestion: probably
Sentence: Talking to the speaker right after the session, is probabely the most effective way to do the job, a duty, which proved to be very important to be done in most cases.
Error: probabely Suggestion: probably
flaws:
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5 //minimum 4 paragraphs wanted
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 26 15
No. of Words: 413 350
No. of Characters: 1821 1500
No. of Different Words: 200 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.508 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.409 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.531 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.885 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.013 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.261 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.388 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.155 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5