Every human being is exposed to make mistakes no matter who he is or how much he is educated. If a teacher or a meeting leader asserts something incorrect, we should respond to this in a careful way. In my opinion, I think that the best thing to do would be to wait until the class or meeting is over, then talk to the teacher or meeting leader alone away from people.
First, correcting the teacher or meeting leader alone is better because in this way I would not embarrass the person who is in a higher level than me. Correcting anything for a teacher or meeting leader in front of other members may lead to both of us to feel uncomfortable. For example, if a student correct his teacher in front of his colleagues, then his teacher may not be prepared to answer him. Thus, a personal conflict may arise. This would affect his marks or his performance in his career and future.
Second, to correct a mistake right away would be an inappropriate behavior. This would not make me satisfied or give me an advantage over my teacher or leader. Every one has his own level and own responsibility. No one should jump over the protocol. Moreover, an inappropriate behavior from me may cause other colleagues to take a terrible idea about me and about my personality. So, I would prefer to wait and not take a chance with my social and work relationships.
Furthermore, if I did not correct this right away we both would have a great chance to double check on the information proposed. So, if I waited I would have enough time to be sure and confident about what I am going to correct for a person who is in charge of me. And when I do that, my teacher or leader would respect me more and appreciate it. Thus, this may cause me to be the most favorite student or team member.
As a conclusion, being careful in how to handle a situation where your teacher or a meeting leader is not right is very salient. This may affect your studies and career positively or may otherwise cause an enormous conflict.
- TPO 33:Agree/Disagree:When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, students will learn much more effectively than ask them to do alone. 80
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 80
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 90
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful way" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ng incorrect, we should respond to this in a careful way. In my opinion, I think that the best t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, thus, for example, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45652173913 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64432194775 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459239130435 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7119027776 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179013504276 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061444111373 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644733909753 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116997718187 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580952709797 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 10.9000537634 79% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.