The best reaction to a wrong statement in class has always been a controversial issue among students. While some students believe that interrupting the teacher and correcting the mistake is the best thing to do, there are others holding the view that students should neglect the mistakes of teachers. As far as I am concerned students should react to the teacher in a logical manner. It goes without saying that neglecting the mistake or interrupting the teacher will cause some problems. So waiting until the class or meeting is over is the best approach in my view. I will vindicate my standpoint in the following article.
The first point that juts out of the mind is the fact that, interrupting the class may cause a loss of concentration and miss-scheduling. An example can illustrate this. Imagine a student who interrupts the teacher and starts to argue about an incorrect statement. Likewise, the teacher reacts to his opinion afterward. These arguments will stop the teacher to spend enough time on the matters that are in the class schedule. This indicates that, waiting until the end of class and argue your opinion is the best approach about a wrong statement occurred by a teacher or meeting leader.
The second point that is worth considering is the fact that when a teacher explains some scientific matter incorrectly, students will learn wrong information about the topic. In this situation, if a student knows that the teacher's statement is false, he should mention it to the teacher at the end of the class. Consequently, the teacher can correct his mistake in the following sessions. Needless to say, neglecting a situation like this by a student who is aware of the wrong explanations of the teacher may cause serious problems to his classmates in following sessions.
To make a long story short, neglecting the problem or interrupting the teacher are not the best reactions. According to the reasons that are mentioned above, talking to the teacher at the end of the class can bring best results for the class, the teacher, and the students.
- TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some 76
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 71
- TPO-26 - Integrated Writing Task The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot b 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-49 - Integrated Writing Task Like many creatures, humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes. How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling. In the case of humpback whales, we may have found the answer: the 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hould neglect the mistakes of teachers. As far as I am concerned students should r...
^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a logical manner" with adverb for "logical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ed students should react to the teacher in a logical manner. It goes without saying that neglecting...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
...matter incorrectly, students will learn wrong information about the topic. In this si...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... situation, if a student knows that the teachers statement is false, he should mention i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, likewise, may, second, so, while, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95977011494 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81097353285 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468390804598 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0309853208 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8888888889 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217600658266 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077355016257 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542608153925 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14183530396 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346577320016 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.