In my experience as a student, a few time I happened to have a different opinion from the teacher holding the class. I do not usually interrupt the lessons, but if I think it is very important to understanding the topic, I do. Every time I thought that something incorrect was said that would prevent me from understand or following the teacher, I raised my hand and ask for an explanation.
First, I believe that if I have a doubt about what it is being explained, many other students could have the same question, therefore, interrupting the lesson and pointing out something that it is not clear or receiving a better explanation about it may help the classroom as a whole. Sometimes students think to be in disagreement with teachers just because they do not wholly understand what they are listening to or they find it difficult to follow complex arguments, which need to be explained with other words or examples.
Second, another reason why I prefer to interrupt the lesson is when I do not really understand something or I believe that, for example, a phenomenon can be explained from the way it is presented, this is very useful for me to follow the reasoning and have a complete idea of what I am learning. If an idea comes up in my mind and it is different from the one of the teacher, I need to know what the teacher thinks about it. This is because I believe that during lectures it is very important to interact with the teachers, in order to have interesting discussions that could improve the overall understanding of the topic of the lesson.
Finally, I believe that interruptions as long as they are very short and used to really ask for explanations or to expose a different point of view, are very useful for the entire classroom and not annoying at all. On the contrary, If you need a longer explanation or you are totally in disagreement with the teacher, in my opinion, is it better to say nothing during the lecture, then talk to the teacher when the class is over and the people have gone.
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 81
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 80
- TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him 76
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 78
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
In my experience as a student, a few time I happened to have a different opinion ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, really, second, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58126721763 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79712965543 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465564738292 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 20.1344086022 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.494650941 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.3 100.406767564 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.3 20.6045352989 176% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 5.45110844103 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140638364824 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624210295459 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316863837275 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951791263781 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026178376967 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.1575268817 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.88 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.0537634409 163% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.