It goes without saying that today’s world is a communication era and also advanced technology plays a crucial rule in individuals’ lives. Most of people access to mobile phone, television, social medias and so on in their daily lives. So, it becomes hard to restrict news and not reaction to them. In this regardless, a controversial question raises: Is it important for us to be aware of news from all around the world or not? From my perspective, paying attention to the news has perfect consequences in people’s life. I will elaborate on my point through two outstanding reasons.
The first reason to be mentioned is that news gives a wide perspective to people in order to cope with different and arduous situation. Indeed, by listening to the news, we can be acquainted to crises and the ways of resolving them. Every day, we see some occurrences occur in some point and also their consequences which only news can cover them. Furthermore, people in another points can realize these events and analyze them and if they have awful results prevent from them or if they have perfect results try to have same events in their societies. As a result, societies would have precise views to face with various situations.
The second reason is that news familiars us with various kind of cultures and nations. Events in each country may have some historical and cultural background such as our Nowruz festival in Iran. News provides some information about these events for people who do not about them; for instance, how do these events create, how long do they take, and so on. Furthermore, news reduces cultural conflicts and consequently makes international relationships firm and friendly.
To put it briefly, news has important effects on our lives and paying attention to news can provide us some crucial results. Not only can we achieve a wide perspective but also we can familiar with different cultures. So, I would like to offer everyone to be aware of events all around the world.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should require every graduating students to take public speaking courses Give specific examples and details to support your answer 85
- If there’s a way to improve yourself, which one among the three choices you would take?1. take more exercise2. eat healthy food3. reduce the amount of stress 60
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 75
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before Give specific examples and details to support your answer 91
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...rucial rule in individuals' lives. Most of people access to mobile phone, television, soc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95857988166 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86050460716 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541420118343 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8917196304 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120216844825 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369548957971 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358964923389 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784160370779 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213529808225 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.