Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that people who maintain their olden friendship are happier and with higher self-confidence than who changing their friend's group a lot. So the ability to maintain the old friendship is superior to ability to make new friends so quickly. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that if we have many friends instead of limited our friend's group to a few people, we would be more satisfying because we can get assistance from more person at the time of problems. However, I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that the ability to maintain a friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
First and foremost, the old friends are who stand up to help us during crisis times. For example, two years ago, I had serious business failures and I should sell my house. None of my co-worker whose I really account on them did not support me at this time. Notwithstanding, one of my close friends borrow money to me and help me to rise from ashes.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that close friends can more understand you and they are more trustworthy. When we know someone for long period of time, we can confidence to them and sharing our concern with them and getting a consultation from them. For instance, my friends and I always speak about our family problems together and all of us try honestly to find solution for them.
Finally, yet importantly, people who make new friends frequently are not favorable person in society. People see them as a person that just think about their own benefit and make a relationship with others to take advantage of it. People believe that they are free from moral beliefs and humanity values. Therefore, they are almost very alone in oppose of their high skill in starting a relationship with other ones.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that maintaining deep friendships has priority to make many new friends. Because close friends are more caring and confidence than new friends and people with weakness in keeping old friends are mainly alone and sad individuals.
- TPO 37 3
- TPO41 IndependentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. 76
- one of the best ways that parents can help their children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 76
- The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Do you agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...er and with higher self-confidence than who changing their friends group a lot. So ...
^^^
Line 1, column 620, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...e ability to maintain a friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 657, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...stworthy. When we know someone for long period of time, we can confidence to them and sharing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, honestly, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79896907216 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61598319029 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528350515464 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.282330008 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.529411765 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380091210415 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11776973203 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14155548299 0.0737576698707 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194895238106 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138712997177 0.0645574589148 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.