How improve students’ university experience are always the priority of a university. Increasing the quality of technological facilities and reconstructing the entertainment facilities are two potential options. It is true that the first one has its own advantages, but it is pale when compared with redesigning the entertainment spaces.
To begin with, these entertainment spaces provide students with an excellent opportunity to mingle with various people and help them relax. In these recreational spaces, students can get to know students from different majors and students with different personalities; making friends with them is exciting and refreshing, which also can expand their social circle. Further, nowadays, students are busy taking countless classes, doing arduous assignments, and preparing for various exams daily. They are so exhausted and need some ways to release this pressure from school. There is no more efficient approach to receiving stress than sharing time with friends or exchanging honest thoughts with friends.
Admittedly, some may suggest that high-quality technological facilities, like microscopes or computers, can contribute to students’ academic performance. For example, a student who majored in economics may master mathematics and economics, but he also needs some proper equipment in order to create the correct model and predict the tendency of the market. Nevertheless, acquiring knowledge is not the only goal of a college education. Another primary goal should be to prepare students for their future careers. Students can get in touch with other students in the entertainment spaces and communicate with each other. Through these communications, students’ communication skills can be improved, which is crucial for their future career life. Nowadays, works increasingly involve cooperation. People who only focus on their studies can never achieve success as a team. A recent study conducted by Harvard University has shown that when asked what the most important quality for an office worker is, fifty-eight percent of people chose ‘communication skill/cooperation.’
In a nutshell, it is undoubtedly a wiser choice that uses the money to redesign spaces where students can have fun for the reasons discussed above.
- People who cannot accept criticism will not succeed working in teams 76
- Imagine that two different companies have offered you a Job One company offers average pay and expects you to work for a normal number of hours each week For example in the United States 40 hours per week Is often standard The other company offers much hi 68
- In order to adapt to the life in university and succeed if you are a freshman which method do you think is better 1 attending a one week orientation or introduction program when you are in the university campus and before classes begin 2 meeting regularly 76
- World hunger is a complicated issue that has been frequently discussed but not resolved Some people believe the problem can only be addressed by wealthy governments and large companies Other people believe that each one of us can actually do something to 71
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7426035503 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24187597115 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633136094675 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8226988421 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.176470588 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8823529412 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383291340069 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107546462012 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745701301017 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235140731008 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422640280427 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 10.9000537634 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.