Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country

Essay topics:

Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.

Throughout the history, human beings lifestyle has changed enormously since they have a tendency to improve their lives. In my opinion, museums are able to learn a lot of things which individuals cannot find them anywhere. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.

Firstly, people are able to increase their knowledge and expand their horizon about a country by visiting museums. It is obvious that there are a lot of things in the museums that enhance people's information about how people interact with each other, how people wear in that country, what kind of food people eat, and also the most important things are that how people were living in that country from past to now. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. Last year, my brother and I went to Rome, then we went to a famous museum in there. By visiting their museums, I become familiar with their lifestyle and many things about them. As a result of visiting their museum, I could make friends with Italian people because they were curious how I know much about their country. For this reason, I strongly believe that visiting museums can be very useful and instructive for learning about others country.

Secondly, some people believe that the best way for learning about others country is searching on the internet because of there a great deal of information about each country on the internet. On the other hand, others are convinced that the best way for learning about others country is visiting their museums on account of the fact that they are able to speak with different people, and also people working there in order to increase their information. Hence, I firmly agree with the latter idea, for I contend that the more people debate with other native people face to face, the more they are able to learn about their country. For example, people working in the museums have reliable and first hands information because they have studied in that fields. Consequently, visiting museums provide a great opportunity for people to talk with a large number of people, also they can give each email address in order to share their idea about new aspects of a country.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that the best for learning about other country is to visit their museums. Not only are they able to become familiar with a wide variety of things about their country, but also they can talk with people are skillful enough to convey important things about that country

Votes
Average: 9.1 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-18 Percival Wong 95 view
2022-01-19 all30of4 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Mehrdad.imn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
Throughout the history, human beings lifestyle has changed enormously since ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 843, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eat opportunity for people to talk with a large number of people, also they can give each email a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2094.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88111888112 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34801484131 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431235431235 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7652485325 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.176470588 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2352941176 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343000783375 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129814340324 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944561634178 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219511112996 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925030680528 0.0645574589148 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.