The saying goes " A individual is known by the company he keeps". In my opinion working with different types of person helps us to know many things as the thinking of each person differ according to their personality. I strongly agree with the author's view. The same i would like to support with the following examples.
First of all, different people have different skills in which they are good at. We all know that, " A owner was once a worker". Let us consider an example of, an fresher engineer working at the site has less practical knowledge than the co-workers. If a person is good in some skill he/she can help others learn and grow from it. Different type of people teach us different things. Some people are good at working with computers while some are good at field work while some are good at both.
Secondly, things have changed from generation to generation. Let us consider an example, the intellect level of the people has grown with the time. People have reached moon which once seemed impossible. There are many such things which once seemed impossible is now easily persuadable. Different people have different characteristic from which we can learn. We might have seen cobbler mending shoe, garage mechanic repairing your automobile, chef making different varieties of delicious food, a singer with melodious voice, an actor acting. They all teach us something in different field and have different characteristic respective to their field.
This unique characteristic helps their co-worker and colleagues learn many things.
In conclusion, working with different types of people having different types of characteristic not only opens a wide range of idea but also makes us learn new way of doing things in easy and faster way.
- Claim Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Reason It is inappropriate and perhaps even cruel to use public resources to fund the arts when people s basic needs are not b 80
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 83
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals 78
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves 50
- The director of the International Health Foundation recently released this announcement quot A new medical test that allows the early detection of a particular disease will prevent the deaths of people all over the world who would otherwise die from the 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The saying goes ' A individual is k...
^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...y agree with the authors view. The same i would like to support with the followin...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o support with the following examples. First of all, different people have diff...
^^^
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...r'. Let us consider an example of, an fresher engineer working at the site ha...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eld work while some are good at both. Secondly, things have changed from gener...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...racteristic respective to their field. This unique characteristic helps their c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 293.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05802047782 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72062251301 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552901023891 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1655320585 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4210526316 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291899473444 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871651333068 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557723216134 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166629964001 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259394401342 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.