A simple recognition of the argument leads our discussion to controversial issue of children need to be sent to child-care center or an individual caregiver. Some of people hold that individual caregiver offers professional ability allowing child with all-around development. While, others advocate that child-care center helps child to gradually form relationships with other children. In my opinion, child-care center drives child to be better in future.
First, it is no better way to promote child to learn how to keep contact with other children when they are young. Human being is a kind of social animals. Communication is key aspect throughout our lifetime. Child stays together with peers and gradually forms some inevitable awareness which is beneficial in society. For example, children introduce themselves one by one in the center, which allows them to show themselves in front of a crowd of people. Then, when they are familiar with each other, they will meet different kinds of children with various character. Some of children are eager to be absorbed by their own world, and silence is their friend, but some of them are enthusiastic and tend to talk with people. Children in the center slowly adopt different methods to handle with different relationships. Such as, outgoing children are initiative to talk with you, and you don’t need care that thing is going to be embarrassing, but it is possible to be embarrassing that you try approaching children with silence. Besides, most of children in the center are not self-centered, owing self-centered individual will be exclude from group of children. Children sent to individual caregivers are easy to build a self-centered awareness. In the process of gaining education alone, children lack much opportunity to communicate with peers. Then the character of children is not complete for being a quality citizen in the future.
Second, some opponents challenge that child-care center can’t take care of all of children at the same time, the special talent in children can’t be cultivated properly. However, nowadays, a heap of child-care center set up some special class for these children. Some children tend to like solving math problems or writing paragraphs, the center offer some chance for children to foster their interest. Meanwhile, the center with expertise making curriculum to allow children to foster all-around development. Actually, it is unnecessary for young children to sharpen one special skill early, they are in period to find interested things.
Therefore, I firmly believe child-care center is seemingly better.
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- When parents cannot afford the time to accompany with their children, they could choose to send their children to the child-care centre where many children have cared together; or they could send their children to an individual caregiver. Which one is bet 83
- TPO-12 - Integrated Writing Task Jane Austen (1775-1817) is one of the most famous of all English novelists, and today her novels are more popular than ever, with several recently adapted as Hollywood movies. But we do not have many records of what she lo 71
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 21 Independent writing taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Some of', you should use 'the' ('Some of the people') or simply say ''Some people''.
Suggestion: Some of the people; Some people
...care center or an individual caregiver. Some of people hold that individual caregiver offers p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...wing child with all-around development. While, others advocate that child-care center...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'helps'' or 'help's'?
Suggestion: helps'; help's
... others advocate that child-care center helps child to gradually form relationships w...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 421, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drives'' or 'drive's'?
Suggestion: drives'; drive's
...ldren. In my opinion, child-care center drives child to be better in future. First, i...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d-care center drives child to be better in future. First, it is no better way to promote...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 568, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Some of', you should use 'the' ('Some of the children') or simply say ''Some children''.
Suggestion: Some of the children; Some children
...nds of children with various character. Some of children are eager to be absorbed by their own w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1041, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the children') or simply say ''most children''.
Suggestion: most of the children; most children
...oaching children with silence. Besides, most of children in the center are not self-centered, ow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3795620438 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97053887486 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52798053528 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4380181789 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1304347826 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8695652174 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65217391304 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374617680057 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121239893509 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562313575747 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226110841705 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974715407812 0.0645574589148 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.