The teaching methods can affect students learning development. Some people think it is more beneficial for students to take online courses, while others argue that online lectures can benefit students more. As for me, I believe that the traditional teaching form can be more beneficial for students.
First of all, the traditional classes can allow students to solve their problems instantly because they can always find teachers and academic resources at school. For example, when I studied in junior high school, I always asked the literature questions in my Chinese teacher’s office next to my classroom. Without any tardiness, I could learn rapidly and brought no question after school. Furthermore, if the teacher was not available, I would go to the school library to figure out the come-in-handy information. With the teaching and learning resources harness, I performed well on each academic exam and evaluation. Hence, taking the classes at school really helped me with acquiring studying assistance from teachers and school resources.
Secondly, students can easily build social connections by interacting with other students if they take the classes in the traditional way. For instance, when I studied in high school, I could easily keep in touch with other classmates and set up appointments conveniently. By attending different clubs such as the baseball team and pop music club, I made hundreds of friends with other students at school. Moreover, due to the long lecturing at school, my friends and I had a stick and tight sense of belonging, making us help each other to overcome our challenges. Therefore, taking the class with a traditional approach at school really broadened my social connections and built deeper relationships with other students.
Thirdly, online classes may sometimes be negative to students’ studies since students are easily to be obsessed with fancy online social media. Take my sister, Jenny, for example; when she took the online math courses, she was always disturbed by the notifications of Facebook and Instagram. Because of the fancy social page and chat room, Jenny could not help taking a glimpse while she was watching the lecturing. Additionally, she was so obsessed with posting her selfies and chatting with other friends that she missed the exam during the class, making her failed on the math course. Consequently, taking online classes might easily be disturbed by other online fancy media and lost her concentration of studying.
In conclusion, I hold the profound conviction that taking traditional classes can benefit students more. After all, by attending traditional classes, not only can students solve their problems quickly but they can also build social connections easily.
- In times of economic crisis in which field do you think the government can cut financial support 1 Art2 Scientific research3 Parks and public gardens 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the future will read fewer books 73
- TPO21 Integrated Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the future will read fewer books 82
- If you are a teacher and is going to do a project with two students which of the following method would you choose a instruct them separately and divide the projects into three parts so you only have to do your own part b finish all parts of the project w 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, while, after all, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2324.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36720554273 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82424903549 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505773672055 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0072636572 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.619047619 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320624614373 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113225637275 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123053353506 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217696919254 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100730454124 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.