workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long
Currently, society has witnessed unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, thus city dwellers are attaching more importance to challenges existing in their jobs, instead of their salaries or other working conditions. A myriad of individuals contend that they have the preference for doing similiar tasks all day long since it does not make them to suffer from pressure generated from excessive workload, while others harbor the idea that multiple types of tasks to do during workday make them feel more satisfied with their jobs. Personally speaking, I concur with the latter opinion and my view can be subtantiated as follows.
To start with, tackling with different tasks is conducive to our job promotion and achievement. When we enter the employment market, what we possess is merely the theoretical knowledge imparted from professors, however this kind of knowledge can not be applied to deal with real problems directly since real problems are always inextricably intertwined with diversified emergence or other factors. Therefore, the mere approach to improve our aptitude of handling different situation is accumulating pragmatic experience from handling different types of tasks, which constitutes a stepping stone in our job promotion and achievemnts. The more kinds of tasks we handle, the more experience we amass. Gradually, we are entitled to address varieties of challenges confronted with us based on the gradually enhanced experience. Hence, not only the leaders are inclined to render us with opportunities of job promotion, but also we are afforded with more chances to experience other decent and well-paid job positions. For instance, two of my colleagues, Rebecca and Susan, entered our company in the same time. After they were employed by our company, Rebecca has spared no effort to seize each working opportunities without any hesitation, including the affairs related with diversified domains, like marketing, advertisements and so on, which contributes to the improvement of her personal ability. In contrast, Susan has been dealing with same affairs, like making preparation for coming meetings. After two years, both of them were evaluated by the leaders in their department. Eventually, Rebecca got promoted, while Susan, without any eminent ability or contribution the development of the company, is fired due to her poor performance during evaluation. This example illuminates that the challenges emerging in our jobs, for the sake of honing our pragmatic skills, make us more pleased with us.
What's more, dealing with different types of tasks also affords us with the sense of achievement. Every time we handle the problems successfully, we are proud of the achievement we attain and feel more pleased with our own capability. The research conducted to evaluate individuals willingness demonstrates that 78% individuals reckon that although it is back-breaking to handle varities of tasks in different domains, they do obtain numerous rewards from the process, not only the material awards rendered by companies, but also the spiritual reward. Most of them feel satisfied with their jobs due to the sense of achievement and they regard this spiritual award as the dominant factor they continue to work hard to make contribution to their companies.
Admittedly, doing synonymous tasks all day long takes less time and energy, however it is tedious for individuals to deal with same affairs without any hope. Meanwhile, what they can attain from jobs is really limited.
In a nutshell, from what has been mentioned above, workers are more satisfies with jobs full of disserent types of tasks. For one thing, it enables them to sharpen their pragmatic skills. For another, it renders them with the sense of achievement which nurtures their tenacity to keep working.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-28 | MiladHakimi | 81 | view |
- Some people think that some lessons include video games as a way to make children's interest in study. Other people think it is distracting and waste time. Which one do you prefer? 73
- If your friend wants to reduce living expenses, which would you suggest?1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.2. Buy the new technology products less frequently.3. Shop for less expensive food and cooking at home 73
- Government has done enough to educate people the importance of a balanced lifestyle and healthy eating habits 3
- Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the courses?1. Some professors who are voted to be the most popular one.2. Some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research. 3
- If your friend wants to reduce living expenses, which would you suggest?1. Find a roommate that can share the living expenses.2. Buy the new technology products less frequently.3. Shop for less expensive food and cooking at home 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... skills, make us more pleased with us. Whats more, dealing with different types of t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bution to their companies. Admittedly, doing synonymous tasks all day long take...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in contrast, kind of, for one thing, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 97.0 52.1666666667 186% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3215.0 1977.66487455 163% => OK
No of words: 595.0 407.700716846 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40336134454 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93888872473 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9246962051 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 303.0 212.727598566 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509243697479 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 997.2 618.680645161 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.2537071804 48.9658058833 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.958333333 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7916666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215663286987 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596694295411 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753292528785 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146435378819 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671494081769 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 179.0 86.8835125448 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.