You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her?

From a broad perspective, in current state of affair we face, people established different kind of relationships, it is not far-fetched that friendship is the most important kind among them. One of controversial questions which is often raised related to this issue is that we should continue our friendship with those who have different viewpoint from us or not. I firmly concur with idea that it is better to continue our friendships with them. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that friendship has more meaning than mere agreement between two persons. Actually, intimidation is the backbone of every relationship. Having aquainted to each other, people make decision to become closer. They have spent a lot of time with ewach other before becoming friends. There are a lot of circumstances in which they had oposite viewpoints, and it is the situations that distinguish people with each other. People should realize that these difference make them to become learn people. Take two persons who want to vote for completely different candidate in an upcoming election as an example. Their political viewpoints has nothing to do with their friendship, and it allows them to get familiar with each candidate’s weak points and strength point.

In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above one should refer to another subtle point metiulously that in thoday's modern world, differences do not necessarily define as a bad point. Indeed, modern world are making their effort to take step forward toward democracy, and differences help people in the way toward it. Undoubtedly, if there are no varied viewpoints, people will have difficulty to find what the right way is. Just imagine a country having only one political party, this polital party can gain so much power that it dominate all parts of the government, and finally, it make step toward dictatorship in view of the fact that there is no opposite viewpoint to control it. So, having different viewpoint provides an opportunity for people to learn from each other.

Taking all aforementioned argument into account, I believe that we should stay friend with those who have different viewpoint from us on the ground that friendship is valuable.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...se difference make them to become learn people. Take two persons who want to vote for ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...arts of the government, and finally, it make step toward dictatorship in view of the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the ground that friendship is valuable.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, if, so, apart from, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17741935484 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88988371924 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561827956989 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2990746245 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94444444444 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135870573122 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464299811161 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464374685002 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946892827813 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381280184524 0.0645574589148 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.