The article and the lecture are about a specific silver coin, which dating to the eleventh century, was presumably brought from Europe. The author does not only believe that this coin is fake but also provides some reasons that support it. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the statements made by the author. She believes that this coin is, in fact, evidence of the contact between European and Native American.
First, the author claims that the site in which this coin was found is much far away of usual sites in which there have been other types of remains. Therefore, it is unlikely that the silver coin assembles to the theory that was brought from Europe. Nevertheless, this hypothesis is challenged by the lecturer who posits that other objects have been found in places distant from the main site. Furthermore, she points out that American from that period used to travel and they could lose this coin during these trips. norse
Second, the article states that due to no other coins have been found, it is presumed that they did not bring this type of objects with them to North American settlements. Nonetheless, the lecturer discredits this point by explaining that European established permanent settlements in North America but when they went back to Europe, they packed everything and brought back with them.
Finally, the author mentions that because native American did not understand the significance of these silver coins, those were considered useless. Therefore, European did not pack these objects for the exploration in North America. The lecturer, on the other hand, puts forth the idea that due to Native American liked objects which expressed beauty or were attractive, they would have considered these coins as jewelry, and consequently, they would have traded with them.
- Undoubtedly, technology has changed our lives in several ways. One of the most important advances has been in terms of communication. Currently, people have the facility to be aware of what is happening worldwide. Therefore, I personally believe that is i 75
- The author professes that Agnostids were arthropods and proposes three theories about how they lived based on the fossil records. However, the professor finds the ideas implausible and expresses a profound disagreement by elaborating on the fact that the 80
- People behavior has changed over time. Many years ago, young people used to obey rules from their parents but this dependence has changed. Currently, students make decisions by themselves without consulting opinions from other. Therefore, I personally bel 76
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 61
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n site. Furthermore, she points out that American from that period used to travel...
^^
Line 2, column 520, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Norse
...ould lose this coin during these trips. norse Second, the article states that due to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10135135135 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44698163828 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4400275402 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.153846154 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275045861981 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108022847989 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579502656799 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172243440308 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398000525005 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.