4-day workweek
The Article is about transition of many companies from 5-day workweek to 4-day workweek plan in USA. The author points out about various benefits from this change, while professor opposes these points by mentioning about his own views. Working hours plays important role for those children who’s upbringing is with both the employed parents.
Firstly, author states that money spent on gas and fuel will reduce as one day is reduced. Professor refuses this point stating that there will not be tremendous benefit on this point. He explains with an arithmetic calculation of average miles covered and money used in gasoline. Approximately employee needs to travel for 30 miles which would use 15 to 20 dollars of gas a week and if one day is omitted then yearly 850 dollars will be saved. So, there will be some benefit but it won’t be extraordinary.
Secondly, author writes about cutting cost and saving money due to reduction in operating costs of business. Also working efficiency will be improved due to 3 days of weekend. Professor claims negatively by mentioning about 20% loss in business due to one day less in working of business and also states that in 4 days business will be open for late evening hours but consumers will be in hurry for returning home and so no one would visit business place. Hence, evening working hours will be less beneficial than the whole day of 5-day workweek.
Thirdly, author posits that employee will get more time with family. Professor casts doubt on this by making point of children and need of putting them in day care which stays open in late evening. He also adds up telling that during that extra one day off children would be attending their schools in morning half of the day, so parents will not get time to spend with them. So, professor puts forward strong points in oppose of writer for mentioned benefits of 4-day workweek.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | May Alsanea | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...duction in operating costs of business. Also working efficiency will be improved due...
^^^^
Line 4, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r mentioned benefits of 4-day workweek.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 324.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84259259259 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43701913449 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9220795399 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306507622471 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125449265107 0.0996497079465 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165568722692 0.0662205650399 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215306445687 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797892637228 0.0443174109184 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.