Agnostids
The professor discusses three reasons to indicate why the theories mentioned in the reading do not have an adequate measure. The information she represents is in direct contrast to the facts outlined in the reading passage.
First of all, the speaker points out that Agnostids were not free swimming predators due to the fact that they didn't have large and well developed eyes. On the other hand, according to the reading it is possible that Agnostids were predators which hunt small organisms to provide their food.
Second, the lecturer makes it clear that there is evidence that Agnostids moved in a high speed and they could not be seafloor inhabitants. In fact, she notes that seafloor occupies a small area. In contrast, the reading describes that by living on the seafloor Agnostids may have provided their food from bacteria or other dead organisms.
Third, the professor explains that since Agnostids had a large number of population, the fact that they were parasites is rejected. In addition, the professor emphasized that parasites do not have large population. However, the reading states that Agnostids maybe were parasites which dwelled on other larger organisms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-05 | YasamanEsml | 86 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | reza_fattahi | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | reza_fattahi | 86 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | reza_fattahi | 75 | view |
- coins Norse 66
- frogs 85
- magine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? •Interrupt and correct the mistake right away. •Wait until the class or meeti 71
- electronic medical records 83
- Agnostids 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ing predators due to the fact that they didnt have large and well developed eyes. On ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...essor explains that since Agnostids had a large number of population, the fact that they were par...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, second, so, third, well, in addition, in contrast, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 191.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23036649215 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6081707679 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4421466609 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.9 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267745536425 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112985416765 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928472518631 0.0662205650399 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16326355796 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0946890475692 0.0443174109184 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.