Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern-day insects. However, the fossil information does not allow paleontologists to determine with certainty what agnostids ate or how they behaved. There are several different theories about how agnostids may have lived.
Both reading and the lecture revoles around the assumptions around the way that Agnosids live and fed, according to the fossils and evidences. The writng suggests three different theories regarding this theories while lecturer finds them dubios and cast doubt on the ideas mentioned in the paragraphs.
Firts, the article claims that the agnastis may have been free swimming predators because they were small enough to search for tiny organisims in the ocean and prey on them. In the contrast, the woman holds the view that the free swiming predotorss usually have massive eyes with a well developed vision to chase for food, while the agnastis had small poor developed eyes and some of them were even blind. Therefore, the mentioned idea about agnastis is right duo to the fact that no evidence was found about a accptable vision level of them or a sensory organ to help them catch the preys.
Second, the writer suggests that the agnastis were seafloor dwellers and survived by scavening dead organisims or grazing on bacteria. On the contrary, the lecturer points out that the sea floor dwellers did not have the ability to move very fast for a long distance, thus, they were slow creatures who's habitat were small and limited. Yet, the fossils based evidence shows that the agnastis used to be tiny and had the ability to move fast for a long distances. So this hypothesis is also wrong.
Furthermore, The authur sates that there is the possiblity that agnastis were parasites, living and feeding from large organisms. Conversely, the speaker holds the view that parasites have a small and limitted population while on the other hand, agnastis had a large population based on the amount of discovered fossils. So this theory, like as all aformentioned posssibilities is worthless.
- Question Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meetin 73
- Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage 3
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 3
- An airship is a type of aircraft that flies using a very large balloon filled with a lighter than air gas Airships were an important means of air transportation before the 1940s but are little used today having been largely replaced by airplanes and helic 80
- impact of putting speed limitation 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e fact that no evidence was found about a accptable vision level of them or a sen...
^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...istance, thus, they were slow creatures whos habitat were small and limited. Yet, th...
^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at there is the possiblity that agnastis were parasites, living and feeding from ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5408601795 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557046979866 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0132975981 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06452816374 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0964469088085 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358391232584 0.0996497079465 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294023617061 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0563301700654 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175344284105 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.