Alternative

Essay topics:

Alternative

Alternative medicine is a controversial topic. The reading provides some points in favor of such types of therapeutic interventions.On the other hand, the professor lectured about the flaws in alternative medicine approaches.

The professor discussed that conventional medicine is based on scientific documents. Therefore, it’s efficacy can be tested. Alternative medicine has no scientific basis. It’s methods are not tested, refuse to be tested, and/or fail in scientific experiments. This annuls the claim by passage that the alternative medicine is superior to the conventional one.

Moreover, the professor stated that the high demand for alternative methods is the direct result of media propaganda. People are biased by the huge amount of advertisements that promote the false claim about synthetic drugs, i.e. the continuous use of conventional drugs ends up in drug dependency. According to the professor’s argument, the general perception about alternative therapy, which is believed to be a more holistic approach, is false.

Finally, the professor mentioned the formal education of conventional health care providers the strength of it. The credentials achieved by them can be evaluated and their degrees are awarded based on their documented education, for example internships and residencies. However, in contrast to the reading passage, the alternative therapists do not go through such well-designed and intense educational programs.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-12 Anurag96 78 view
2023-03-12 Anurag96 76 view
2023-02-13 zaid 80 view
2023-01-28 reza_fattahi 80 view
2023-01-20 Anna May 125852 60 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...such types of therapeutic interventions.On the other hand, the professor lectured ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88732394366 5.08290768461 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28692148538 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600938967136 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.55342163355 122% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9683262278 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4615384615 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304346181432 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131375509243 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133881762865 0.0662205650399 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194050137753 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637361531069 0.0443174109184 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 53.8541721854 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.2367328918 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.