The main topic of both the reading and the lecture is about creating some new rules and regulations to save and handle coal ash which actually comprises small amounts of detrimental chemicals. The reading passage claims that the recent limitations are dispensable and may have negative results as well. On the other hand, the lecture not only casts doubt on every single point raised by the author of the reading passage through citing three different counter-arguments but also mentions that none of the mentioned explanations is convincing enough.
To begin with, the author establishes that several impressive environmental limitations and rules are available now such as using liner to avoid coal ash constituents from permeating into the soil and contaminating the environment. In contrast, the lecturer rebuts this idea, stating that it is true that the liner material exists for new lands and ponds but it is not sufficient because it does not really available for old lands and ponds. This issue really engenders a problem for old lands and the drinking water in those areas has been already contaminated.
Furthermore, the reading passage brings up the notion that new regulations maybe do not persuade people to recycle coal ash into other products. Conversely, the professor specifies that this concept does not profoundly lead to consumers to stop using it. For example, the lecturer mentions to the mercury and provides some explanations about this material. He points out that people safely used and recycled this material for several years. This means that people did not stop using it.
Eventually, the reading passage goes on to mention that new limitations lead to a paramount increase in disposal and controlling costs of the power companies. Under such a circumstance, they really increase the price of electricity. Notwithstanding, the lecturer mentions that this idea is not correct and the idea well works because of the amount of electricity fee increases around one percent of this amount. This is really acceptable for having a clean environment.
- Some people believe that parents should pay their children a small amount of money to do jobs around the home (such as washing the dishes or taking out the garbage), while other people believe that parents should not pay their children to do these tasks. 73
- Do you agree or disagree? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends. 80
- It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree? 73
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- TOEFL T P O 41 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, conversely, furthermore, if, may, really, so, well, for example, in contrast, such as, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 332.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27710843373 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89457047753 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542168674699 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1697092795 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06452816374 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0965054389167 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324162477599 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350519402135 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595032666298 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123133641119 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.