The reading and the lecture both are regarding hydrogen based fuel-cell engine. The author of the reading states that it is an efficient solution and has potential to replace internal combustion engine whereas the lecturer have divergent opinion on this topic. The lecturer casts doubts on the main points mentioned in the reading by providing three reasons.
Preeminently, according to the reading petroleum is a finite resource and will eventually run out. In addition, to this author points out that hydrogen is available in variety of sources and will not be depleted so easily. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She claims that hydrogen is not that easily available as it is required in pure liquid state. Furthermore, she points that high advancement in technology is needed as this form of hydrogen needs to be stored in cold region of around negative two hundred and fifty-three degree celcius.
By the same token, the reading states that hydrogen based fuel-cell engine would solve pollution problem as the byproduct of hydrogen is water whereas that of traditional internal combustion engine is carbon dioxide. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She claims that to obtain pure hydrogen it has to undergo purification process which meant that coal and oil have to be burnt which will lead to environmental damage.
In winding up, the reading contends that there will be economic advantage with hydrogen based fuel-cell as they would require only half the fuel to cover same distance as the traditional engine. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that it would not be economically advantages as hydrogen based fuel-cell require platinum which is rare and expensive material, without which the hydrogen would not be able to undergo any reaction.
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting hislife and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famouspeople including kings and writers his memoir has b 80
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Parkville Daily newspaper Throughout the country last year as more and more children below the age of nine participated in youth league sports over 40 000 of these young players suffered injuries
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five shouldn t be allowed 73
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r have divergent opinion on this topic. The lecturer casts doubts on the main point...
^^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...he traditional engine. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that it would not be economic...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, as to, in addition, in contrast, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2701754386 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72234125154 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512280701754 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9324885347 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.538461538 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190456936732 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686292104664 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062597563401 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128042319784 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546215678752 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.